Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 8, 2024. It is now read-only.

Ex09 lines 88-90 clarification #4

Open
whatthedev-eth opened this issue Jul 7, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Ex09 lines 88-90 clarification #4

whatthedev-eth opened this issue Jul 7, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@whatthedev-eth
Copy link

If I understand the recursions correctly, I think comment lines 88-89 should instead say something like this:

# This part of the function is first reached when **length=1 (after return from length=0)**.
# Checking that the **current** value in the array ([array]) is not 0

and line 90 error message should instead be something like

with_attr error_message("**No value of the array should be 0**"):

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant