Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Update Request] Cryptsync #3901

Closed
hgschehl opened this issue Jan 4, 2025 · 5 comments
Closed

[Update Request] Cryptsync #3901

hgschehl opened this issue Jan 4, 2025 · 5 comments

Comments

@hgschehl
Copy link

hgschehl commented Jan 4, 2025

Version requested
1.4.11

https://github.com/stefankueng/CryptSync/releases/tag/1.4.11

@tunisiano187
Copy link
Owner

I don't understand your request, that version is published since December 7th.
https://community.chocolatey.org/packages/cryptsync/1.4.11

@hgschehl
Copy link
Author

I see your point, but ....

I'm using UniGetUI and it (still ...) shows me

Image

It also tells me, that it uses https://community.chocolatey.org/api/v2/ as its source an that it uses Version 2.2.2.

Where's the mistake??
HG

@tunisiano187
Copy link
Owner

Can you test this ?

choco search cryptsync

You should get

Chocolatey v2.4.1
...
cryptsync 1.4.11 [Approved] Downloads cached for licensed users

Maybe this will be the answer

choco cache remove

@tunisiano187 tunisiano187 reopened this Jan 19, 2025
@tunisiano187
Copy link
Owner

I've checked their repository, it seems that they're using a version of chocolatey that is embeded in their code, so i'm not sure it will work as the real one.

@hgschehl
Copy link
Author

Thanks for your quick response. I think I have to dig a bit deeper into this and assume it's a misconfiguration of UniGetUI ...

  • the commands above show the right version
  • UniGetUI are using a choco-Version which is located under %APPDATA%...
  • their path to cryptsync seems to be directly targeting that outdated version - but installs the current one!!
    Weird!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants