We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
According to the biblatex documentation, archivePrefix and primaryClass were added as aliases for eprinttype and eprintclass respectively for arXiv compatibility. See: https://mirrors.ctan.org/macros/latex/contrib/biblatex/doc/biblatex.pdf#subsubsection.2.2.5
archivePrefix
primaryClass
eprinttype
eprintclass
However, it seems that only archivePrefix was implemented in this crate for eprinttype, and primaryClass for eprintclass is missing.
biblatex/src/lib.rs
Lines 764 to 775 in 190576a
Line 830 in 190576a
Is there a reason for the exclusion of primaryClass for eprintclass, or is it simply missed?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
According to the biblatex documentation,
archivePrefix
andprimaryClass
were added as aliases foreprinttype
andeprintclass
respectively for arXiv compatibility.See: https://mirrors.ctan.org/macros/latex/contrib/biblatex/doc/biblatex.pdf#subsubsection.2.2.5
However, it seems that only
archivePrefix
was implemented in this crate foreprinttype
, andprimaryClass
foreprintclass
is missing.biblatex/src/lib.rs
Lines 764 to 775 in 190576a
biblatex/src/lib.rs
Line 830 in 190576a
Is there a reason for the exclusion of
primaryClass
foreprintclass
, or is it simply missed?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: