-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Horizontal Review Tracking #195
Comments
Likely the first two can be closed. It does not look like security reviews have had any response whatsoever (for anyone) in the past 2 years. So we are just waiting on closing PING. |
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
The issue was discussed in a meeting on 2024-01-09
View the transcript1.2. Unclear semantics wrt. JWT claims vs. VC properties (issue vc-jose-cose#205)See github issue vc-jose-cose#205. Manu Sporny: one of the big mistakes with the jwt stuff in v1 and 1.1. was the mapping or not of iss to issuer. Michael Jones: gabe has agreed to take this on. we agree there should be one way to do the mapping. See github issue vc-jose-cose#195. Michael Jones: moving on to issue 195. To do with horizontal review. |
The issue was discussed in a meeting on 2024-01-09
View the transcript1.3. Horizontal Review Tracking (issue vc-jose-cose#195)See github issue vc-jose-cose#195. See github issue vc-jose-cose#192. Michael Jones: This is related to issue 192. Manu Sporny: +1 I agree this would address mine and kyles concerns. Brent Zundel: I know review request was submitted in May 2023.
Brent Zundel: TAG has an issue that is design review, that is closed on orie's request because of text changes. Michael Jones: can you add this to Horizontal Review issue 195. |
Closing as #192 has been completed, and the PING review has closed. Horizontal review has been completed. |
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: