You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@xiaojie1017 Thanks for building and open-sourcing this dataset!
However, I noticed that the height and the width are wrongly annotated in some xml files.
To verify such errors exist, you could refer to the xml annotations of the two images below.
01e070bf7ddddf7afca0d4556418f7bdaa841a29.jpg
0cde37c020e9bfb176f0748ecb10107fbfdf9047.jpg
The similiar error exists in around 10% or more of this dataset. It cause problems when the width and height are directly read from the xml annotation instead of the image file (I found this problem when I try to convert these annotations into yolo format).
A revision on the annotation would be nice, or there should be a note in the readme suggesting that the height and width in xml files are not trustworthy.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@fei-chang Thank you for bringing this issue to our attention and for your valuable feedback on the dataset. I apologize for the inconvenience caused by the incorrect annotations for height and width in some XML files. I am committed to fixing these errors promptly.
To address this, I will include a Python script in the dataset repository that automatically generates the correct width and height for each image, ensuring that the data can be used reliably without manual corrections. This script will help maintain the integrity of the dataset and facilitate its use in various formats, including YOLO.
If it's possible, could you also share the script you used to convert the annotations to YOLO format? It would be immensely helpful for ensuring that our dataset can be seamlessly integrated into different workflows.
Thank you once again for your contribution, and I look forward to resolving this issue quickly.
@xiaojie1017 Thanks for building and open-sourcing this dataset!
However, I noticed that the height and the width are wrongly annotated in some xml files.
To verify such errors exist, you could refer to the xml annotations of the two images below.
The similiar error exists in around 10% or more of this dataset. It cause problems when the width and height are directly read from the xml annotation instead of the image file (I found this problem when I try to convert these annotations into yolo format).
A revision on the annotation would be nice, or there should be a note in the readme suggesting that the height and width in xml files are not trustworthy.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: