JS to TS : simulator/src/data/undo.ts #421
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes focus on enhancing the Changes
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for circuitverse ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
|
cc @niladrix719 |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/simulator/src/data/undo.ts (1)
17-20: Consider combining the early returns for better readability.The function signature and type annotations look great. For the early returns, consider combining them for better readability:
- if (layoutModeGet()) return - if (scope.backups.length < 2) return + if (layoutModeGet() || scope.backups.length < 2) return
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/simulator/src/data/undo.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/simulator/src/data/undo.ts (3)
8-10: LGTM! Well-structured global declarations.The ambient declarations for
globalScopeandloadingare properly typed and well-placed.
21-24: LGTM! Well-typed backup variables.Good use of const and explicit number types for the backup variables.
49-59: LGTM! Thorough cleanup and state restoration.The final cleanup properly restores all necessary state and includes appropriate restricted elements update.
|
@niladrix719 do I really need to reduce the function length to make it under 25 to fit codeclimate ? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/simulator/src/data/undo.ts (1)
17-19: Enhance function documentation with return conditions.While the function signature is well-typed, consider documenting the early return conditions in the JSDoc comment above. This would help users understand when the function exits early.
/** * Function to restore copy from backup * @param scope - The circuit on which undo is called + * @returns void - Returns early if: + * - Layout mode is active + * - Less than 2 backups are available * @category data */
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/simulator/src/data/undo.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/simulator/src/data/undo.ts (3)
8-10: Well-structured global declarations!The TypeScript declarations for global variables are clean and follow best practices.
31-34: Excellent null handling implementation!The code properly handles potential null values from
pop()operation with an explicit check, exactly as suggested in the previous review.
52-62: Clean state management!The final state updates are well-organized, with proper cleanup of the loading flag and necessary updates to the global state.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
src/simulator/src/data/undo.ts (5)
8-10: Consider reducing reliance on mutable global variables.While the TypeScript declarations are correct, using mutable global variables (
globalScopeandloading) can make the code harder to maintain and test. Consider encapsulating these in a class or context object.
13-17: Enhance function documentation.While the function has JSDoc comments, consider adding:
@returnstag to document void return type- Description of side effects
- Documentation for the default parameter
21-23: Use more descriptive variable names for viewport properties.Consider renaming for better clarity:
-const backupOx: number = globalScope.ox -const backupOy: number = globalScope.oy -const backupScale: number = globalScope.scale +const backupViewportX: number = globalScope.ox +const backupViewportY: number = globalScope.oy +const backupViewportScale: number = globalScope.scale
49-55: Consider using object destructuring for property assignments.The property assignments could be more concise using object destructuring:
-tempScope.backups = scope.backups -tempScope.history = scope.history -tempScope.id = scope.id -tempScope.name = scope.name -tempScope.testbenchData = scope.testbenchData +Object.assign(tempScope, { + backups: scope.backups, + history: scope.history, + id: scope.id, + name: scope.name, + testbenchData: scope.testbenchData +})
59-62: Consider using object assignment for viewport restoration.The viewport property restoration could be more concise:
-globalScope.ox = backupOx -globalScope.oy = backupOy -globalScope.scale = backupScale +Object.assign(globalScope, { + ox: backupOx, + oy: backupOy, + scale: backupScale +})
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/simulator/src/data/undo.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/simulator/src/data/undo.ts (2)
31-33: Null handling implementation looks good!The implementation now safely handles the potential null value from
pop()operation, addressing the previous review comment.
37-48: Error handling implementation looks good!The implementation now properly handles JSON parsing errors with appropriate error logging, addressing the previous review comment.
Fixes #414
JS to TS
@niladrix719 @JoshVarga @Arnabdaz @devartstar
To do : Add testbenchData explicitly to scope
Summary by CodeRabbit
Summary by CodeRabbit