-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 128
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor: JS to TS : src/simulator/src/hotkey_binder/model/utils.js #428
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Warning Rate limit exceeded@ThatDeparted2061 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 1 minutes and 5 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThe pull request involves migrating the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
❌ Deploy Preview for circuitverse failed.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/simulator/src/hotkey_binder/model/utils.ts (2)
18-26
: Improve type safety of object utilities.While the generic implementation of
getKey
is good, both functions could be more type-safe.-export function objectSize(obj: Record<string, any>): number { +export function objectSize<T extends Record<string, unknown>>(obj: T): number { return Object.keys(obj).length; } export function getKey<T extends Record<string, any>>(obj: T, val: any): string | undefined { - return Object.keys(obj).find(key => obj[key] === val); + return Object.entries(obj).find(([_, value]) => value === val)?.[0]; }
38-59
: Improve maintainability and type safety of key restrictions.The current implementation could benefit from better type safety and maintainability improvements.
+type ModifierKey = 'Ctrl' | 'Meta'; +type KeyCombination = `${ModifierKey} + ${string}`; export function checkRestricted(key: string): boolean { - const restrictedKeys: string[] = [ + const restrictedKeys: KeyCombination[] = [ 'Ctrl + N', 'Ctrl + W', 'Ctrl + T', 'Ctrl + C', 'Ctrl + V', // ... other combinations ]; - // Adjust for MacOS if needed - const modifiedKeys = getOS() === 'MacOS' - ? restrictedKeys.map(value => - value.startsWith('Ctrl') - ? value.replace('Ctrl', 'Meta') - : value - ) - : restrictedKeys; + const isMacOS = getOS() === 'MacOS'; + const modifiedKeys = isMacOS + ? restrictedKeys.map(value => value.replace('Ctrl', 'Meta') as KeyCombination) + : restrictedKeys; return modifiedKeys.includes(key); }Also consider extracting the restricted keys to a configuration file for better maintainability.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/simulator/src/hotkey_binder/model/utils.js
(0 hunks)src/simulator/src/hotkey_binder/model/utils.ts
(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- src/simulator/src/hotkey_binder/model/utils.js
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/simulator/src/hotkey_binder/model/utils.ts (1)
1-59
: Verify TypeScript migration impact.Let's verify that all dependent files are properly updated to handle the TypeScript migration.
✅ Verification successful
TypeScript migration is properly implemented
The migration of
utils.ts
is part of the project's ongoing TypeScript integration effort. All current imports from dependent files are compatible with the new TypeScript implementation, and no immediate changes are required in the dependent files. This follows the pattern of gradual migration as indicated in the project's todos.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any remaining .js imports of this file rg -l "from ['\"].*utils\.js['\"]" --type ts --type vue # Check for any files still using the old JavaScript version rg -l "import.*from ['\"].*utils['\"]" --type js # Look for potential usage of removed or renamed exports ast-grep --pattern 'import { $_ } from "*/utils"'Length of output: 1762
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check what's being imported from utils rg "import \{.*\} from .*utils" -A 1 # Look for migration documentation fd "MIGRATION|UPGRADE" --type f cat README.mdLength of output: 12188
Fixes #414
cc @niladrix719
The netlify link generated by netlify bot wont work, since many files are inter-related with JS specifying the format as .js while calling different files within themselves, just checking one file will throw error since the new format is .ts !
Summary by CodeRabbit
Refactor
New Features