Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[SVLS-5205] Fix SIGSEGV for Serverless container environments using serverless-init and DogStatsD in multiple containers #32821

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jcstorms1
Copy link
Contributor

What does this PR do?

Adds a nil pointer check to fix a signal segmentation violation in GCP and Azure Serverless container environments using serverless-init and DogStatsD in multiple containers. Previously, if a DogStatsD port was in use by another container, the metric agent would not start and return nil. When creating the cold start metric we did not check for this edge case and would pass a nil pointer to the AddColdStartMetric. This led to a panic and segmentation fault.

Motivation

Issue 26599

Describe how you validated your changes

  • Unit Tests
  • Tested in GCP and Azure container environments

Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs

Additional Notes

@jcstorms1 jcstorms1 added changelog/no-changelog team/serverless qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests labels Jan 9, 2025
@jcstorms1 jcstorms1 added this to the Triage milestone Jan 9, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added the short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly label Jan 9, 2025
@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

Test changes on VM

Use this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM:

inv aws.create-vm --pipeline-id=52551736 --os-family=ubuntu

Note: This applies to commit 95b721f

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Jan 9, 2025

Uncompressed package size comparison

Comparison with ancestor b97c90616b68239053e33f46f4db6900f2c59f4a

Diff per package
package diff status size ancestor threshold
datadog-dogstatsd-arm64-deb 2.29MB 56.14MB 53.85MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-rpm 0.92MB 113.89MB 112.97MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-suse 0.92MB 113.89MB 112.97MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-amd64-deb 0.92MB 113.82MB 112.90MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-aarch64-rpm 0.72MB 109.33MB 108.61MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-arm64-deb 0.72MB 109.26MB 108.54MB 0.50MB
datadog-heroku-agent-amd64-deb -0.38MB 506.18MB 506.56MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-rpm -17.52MB 58.71MB 76.22MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-suse -17.52MB 58.71MB 76.22MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-amd64-deb -17.52MB 58.63MB 76.15MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-aarch64-rpm -56.58MB 950.25MB 1006.83MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-arm64-deb -56.71MB 940.95MB 997.66MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-rpm -261.65MB 1020.94MB 1282.59MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-suse -261.65MB 1020.94MB 1282.59MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-amd64-deb -261.78MB 1011.62MB 1273.40MB 0.50MB

Decision

❌ Failed

Copy link

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: e9c91b94-da21-48ff-acbe-4d9aeea1791f

Baseline: 832149a
Comparison: 95b721f
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization +1.78 [-1.50, +5.06] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle memory utilization +0.50 [+0.46, +0.54] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu % cpu utilization +0.49 [-0.18, +1.16] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency egress throughput +0.05 [-0.87, +0.96] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 egress throughput +0.04 [-0.75, +0.83] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency egress throughput +0.04 [-0.75, +0.82] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency egress throughput +0.02 [-0.62, +0.66] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 egress throughput +0.01 [-0.83, +0.85] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput +0.01 [-0.11, +0.13] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency egress throughput +0.00 [-0.70, +0.70] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load egress throughput -0.00 [-0.47, +0.46] 1 Logs
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.01, +0.01] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization -0.25 [-0.34, -0.16] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput -0.34 [-0.40, -0.28] 1 Logs
file_tree memory utilization -0.44 [-0.57, -0.31] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency egress throughput -0.62 [-1.40, +0.16] 1 Logs

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed links
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs lost_bytes 10/10
quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
changelog/no-changelog qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly team/serverless
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant