-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 145
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[ASM] Catch HttpException when reading the request body in .net461 #6459
Draft
NachoEchevarria
wants to merge
2
commits into
master
Choose a base branch
from
nacho/RequestComExceptionReadingBody
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
At this point, I have to wonder why we're not just catching all exceptions here 🤔 What exceptions would we want to bubble up, if we're catching "valid" issues?
The one concern I have is that it's likely we'll trigger behaviour that only happens the first time a form (or any of the other request data tbh) is accessed.
For example, take this case. We call
EnsureForm()
and that "fills" the form, which triggers an exception. What happens if the customer callsrequest.Form
later? IsEnsureForm
called again and the exception thrown again? If so, that's great. But if not (because it's only called once), then we're potentially introducing hard-to-debug issues...I think the behaviour is what really matters here. e.g. what happens if a customer calls
request.Form
again in this scenario? Is that something we can test (or just confirm from the code)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good point. FillInFormCollection() can potentially throw an HttpException (confirmed by looking at the code) and the next time, _form would not be null anymore so, yes, we might encounter situations where we could be modifying the result obtained by the customers code.
This is something that will happen anyway. If we catch or not the exception will not change that. On the other hand, we really need to read the body of the request. I wonder if there is any possible way that we could read the body of the request without causing this potential behavior change.
About catching exceptions, I tried to be restrictive here, catching only the exceptions types that we have reviewed. If a new exception type is thrown, it would probably be worth to log it and check if we should just catch it or if we should do anything else.