-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Refactor dev_checks method to reduce complexity #182
Conversation
Fixes #181 Refactor the `dev_checks()` method in `CODE/_dev.py` to reduce its complexity. * **Extract User Prompts**: Move the user prompts into a separate method `_perform_checks()`. * **Handle File Operations**: Create a new method `_handle_file_operations()` to manage file operations and logging. * **Update Main Method**: Modify the `dev_checks()` method to call `_perform_checks()` and `_handle_file_operations()`. --- For more details, open the [Copilot Workspace session](https://copilot-workspace.githubnext.com/DefinetlyNotAI/Logicytics/issues/181?shareId=XXXX-XXXX-XXXX-XXXX).
WalkthroughThe pull request refactors the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Suggested Labels
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Code Climate has analyzed commit 61ebdb8 and detected 0 issues on this pull request. View more on Code Climate. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
CODE/_dev.py (1)
83-95
: Consider externalizing the checklist for maximum flexibility.
I dig the for-loop with predefined checks, but if your app gets more checks down the road, you might want to store these prompts in a config file or a constants file. That way you don’t need to jump back into your code each time you add or tweak a prompt.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
CODE/_dev.py
(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
CODE/_dev.py (3)
76-82
: Docstring looks sweet.
Dude, this docstring is totally clear about what_perform_checks()
does! It's super helpful for anyone jumping into the code.
163-165
: Sweet finishing touch ondev_checks()
.
Calling_perform_checks()
first and_handle_file_operations()
next keeps it all nice and tidy. If you find you need to bail out for any reason, you can do so early. Thumbs up!
98-130
: Nice separation of concerns, but watch out for sneaky input issues.
This_handle_file_operations()
function is super structured and easy to look at. Just watch out for any user inputs or file paths that might break your code. Maybe sanitize or verify them if you suspect folks could feed weird stuff in.Would you like me to check references to
_handle_file_operations
across the repo to ensure they handle user-provided paths safely?✅ Verification successful
Yo, your code's actually pretty secure! Just one tiny suggestion tho 🔒
The way you handle files is super safe (nice job with those path checks!), but maybe add a quick check on that version number input? Like, make sure it follows your version format before saving it.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Searching references to _handle_file_operations to confirm usage and potential user inputs rg -A 4 "_handle_file_operations"Length of output: 465
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check implementations of helper functions ast-grep --pattern 'def Get.list_of_files' ast-grep --pattern 'def _prompt_user' ast-grep --pattern 'def _update_ini_file' # Also search with rg for better context rg -A 5 "def Get.list_of_files|def _prompt_user|def _update_ini_file"Length of output: 953
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for Get class/module definition and imports rg -A 5 "class Get|from.*import Get" # Also check if Get might be in a separate file fd -e py -x grep -l "class Get"Length of output: 843
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Get the full implementation of list_of_files method cat CODE/logicytics/Get.pyLength of output: 4722
Fixes #181
Refactor the
dev_checks()
method inCODE/_dev.py
to reduce its complexity._perform_checks()
._handle_file_operations()
to manage file operations and logging.dev_checks()
method to call_perform_checks()
and_handle_file_operations()
.For more details, open the Copilot Workspace session.
Summary by CodeRabbit