Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue 1160 #1172

Merged
merged 61 commits into from
Mar 16, 2022
Merged

Issue 1160 #1172

merged 61 commits into from
Mar 16, 2022

Conversation

kaiiam
Copy link
Contributor

@kaiiam kaiiam commented Jun 9, 2021

@pbuttigieg @rduerr PR addressing #1160 last batch of cryospheric work.

@kaiiam
Copy link
Contributor Author

kaiiam commented Feb 11, 2022

Build is now passing and ready to merge @pbuttigieg @rduerr @wiegandn please have a look or let me know if we're good to merge!

@rduerr
Copy link
Contributor

rduerr commented Feb 22, 2022

@kaiiam I'd love to review this but if you have suggestions for exactly how I should go about doing that, that would be helpful. I have loaded what I think is the #1172 branch of envo-edit into protege and it at least is fine per elk; and I did look at the diff files though the last two seem very opaque to me since I couldn't even find those terms in the envo-edit file. However, it isn't clear how to validate each of the changes made, unless it is by looking at each individual commit and the terms in each in protege? Is that what I am supposed to do? If so, then don't expect something real soon.... since that will take hours....

@kaiiam
Copy link
Contributor Author

kaiiam commented Feb 22, 2022

@rduerr I agree reviewing OWL on github can be a pain. However, this PR comes from sheet 2 of ESIP_Cryo_hackathon_robot_template, hence we have the list of IDs added. Its 24 long so I think that's reasonable to double check. One can simply copy these IDs and then in protege with the branch's envo-edit.owl file loaded hit control (or cmd on mac) + F. Then paste the id in the search box then hit enter. That'll take you to the term.

image

I've checked them and think it's correct with what we put in the robot template (with all the mistakes I found fixed). If there is anything from #1291 you'd like to change please let me know and I can update this PR, otherwise I'd say to just check for obvious errors/mistakes so we can merge these changes in.

ENVO:03000143
ENVO:03000144
ENVO:00000484
ENVO:03000141
ENVO:03000145
ENVO:03000142
ENVO:03000116
ENVO:03400003
ENVO:09200020
ENVO:01000896
ENVO:03400010
ENVO:03400011
ENVO:03400012
ENVO:03400013
ENVO:01000895
ENVO:01000880
ENVO:03400004
ENVO:03400005
ENVO:01000882
ENVO:03400006
ENVO:03400007
ENVO:03400008
ENVO:03400009
ENVO:00000429

@kaiiam
Copy link
Contributor Author

kaiiam commented Mar 9, 2022

@pbuttigieg @rduerr and I will pick this up again next week from ENVO:03400012.

@kaiiam
Copy link
Contributor Author

kaiiam commented Mar 14, 2022

I'd like to fold addressing the issues in #1069 into this PR, upon urgent request from @matentzn, fixing ENVO_01001784 (which chris suggests to remove the EQ axiom) comparing against ENVO_01001479.

@kaiiam kaiiam mentioned this pull request Mar 16, 2022
@pbuttigieg
Copy link
Member

fixing some reasoner errors detected by hermit
image

fossil fuel and and biological pigment are roles in CHEBI, not material entities.

@matentzn of interest to you and @laurenechan

@pbuttigieg pbuttigieg merged commit e8666e1 into master Mar 16, 2022
@pbuttigieg pbuttigieg deleted the issue-1160 branch March 16, 2022 19:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants