Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: improved docs and removed bad code #39

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 20, 2024

Conversation

oshinongit
Copy link
Contributor

@oshinongit oshinongit commented Mar 18, 2024

  • Improved swagger api docs.
  • Adjusted variables received from api request to match the naming convention.
  • Fixed incorrect error message.
  • Removed unnecessary class inheritance.

@oshinongit oshinongit force-pushed the feat-docs-improved-and-cleanup branch from 0674458 to 0d7b319 Compare March 18, 2024 16:47
@oshinongit oshinongit force-pushed the feat-docs-improved-and-cleanup branch from 0d7b319 to 4248fab Compare March 18, 2024 17:00
@oshinongit oshinongit requested a review from martinstark March 18, 2024 17:12
{
schema: {
// description: 'Retrieves an active Production line.',
description: 'Retrieves an active Production line.',
Copy link
Contributor

@martinstark martinstark Mar 19, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

what does it mean that it's active, can the request fail if a line on a production is "inactive"?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Resolved in meeting.

*Line objects can be saved in the service manager memory but not have connection resources allocated in the SMB instance. These are inactive etc.

@oshinongit oshinongit merged commit 9fb4950 into main Mar 20, 2024
6 checks passed
@oshinongit oshinongit deleted the feat-docs-improved-and-cleanup branch March 20, 2024 08:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants