cuda blas backward compatibility #1747
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
I remember seeing some performance difference on RTX GPUs using the "Ex" vs the non-Ex versions (the Ex version was faster). Not sure if that bug is still present. |
|
Should we maybe compile two versions and then ask people on Discord with various GPUs to compare benchmarks? |
Naphthalin
added
the
testing required
|
Switched it to check CC at runtime like in other uses of |
|
Reported to work with a GTX660. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@ankan-ban is there a reason to use
cublasGemmStridedBatchedEx()here?