-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 64
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add support and testing for equivalent units #571
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from 1 commit
d4d89a0
a45179d
0bfe13b
8b96744
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -176,3 +176,14 @@ def W_m_minus_2__to__erg_cm_minus_2_s_minus_1(): | |
def erg_cm_minus_2_s_minus_1__to__W_m_minus_2(): | ||
"""Convert erg per square centimeter and second to Watt per square meter""" | ||
return '1.0E-3{kind}*{var}' | ||
|
||
################## | ||
# Equivalent units # | ||
################## | ||
def m2_s_minus_2__to__J_kg_minus_1(): | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Just checking, does a unit string of There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. In think you mean There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. There should be an underscore between the unit and the exponent, but I agree that the additional There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @climbfuji After some sleuthing, I don't know if we should add the underscore here. We would need to extend units_to_string() to find and partition the baseXpositive_exponent piece of the string. |
||
"""Equivalent units""" | ||
return None | ||
|
||
def J_kg_minus_1__to__m2_s_minus_2(): | ||
"""Equivalent units""" | ||
return None |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't know what this is called in the DSM-5 but I really want a couple of more hash marks here :)
I know where to get some cheap :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is not going to work with prebuild (at least the way the PR is written now). The unit conversions above return
in other words, they contain the input variable in the result string. I think you need to make similar changes to the ccpp_prebuild logic (if
None
then skip the unit conversion altogether), or you may get an error in the Python code, or in the auto-generated Fortran code.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, I didn't add this to prebuild yet.
If we agree on this for Capgen, then I could add it in to Prebuild as part of this PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@gold2718 Nothing is cheap in Norway, not even hashes from what I hear :)
And now I know what DSM-5 is.
(I will add some more hashes in for prettiness)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's what a harrytur* is for.
*Harrytur: Norwegian slang for driving to Sweden to buy stuff that's cheaper there.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@dustinswales The easiest way (no changes at all in prebuild) would be to return just the input variable in the conversion string (
{var}
) for equivalent units, notNone
. If a compiler findsfoo=foo
in the fortran code, it is very likely going to optimize out that line anyway.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@climbfuji Done.
Although I think returning None and skipping writing the equivalence statement is the way to go to skip adding all of "transform infrastructure" to the cap. (not here, but post unification).
When returning Var for equivalent cases, we don't just get a
foo=foo
added before the scheme, but rather: