Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[15.0][FIX] sale_report_salesperson_from_partner: remove unnecessary resources #298

Conversation

pilarvargas-tecnativa
Copy link

cc @Tecnativa TT51908

@sergio-teruel @carlosdauden please review

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @pilar-vargas,
some modules you are maintaining are being modified, check this out!

@pedrobaeza pedrobaeza added this to the 15.0 milestone Dec 4, 2024
@pilarvargas-tecnativa pilarvargas-tecnativa force-pushed the 15.0-rem-sale_report_salesperson_from_partner branch from 659ed49 to 90df0a6 Compare December 4, 2024 13:20
@pilarvargas-tecnativa pilarvargas-tecnativa changed the title [15.0][REM] sale_report_salesperson_from_partner: remove unnecessary resources [15.0][FIX] sale_report_salesperson_from_partner: remove unnecessary resources Dec 4, 2024
Copy link
Member

@pedrobaeza pedrobaeza left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fast-tracking this for removing the offending field.

/ocabot merge minor

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

What a great day to merge this nice PR. Let's do it!
Prepared branch 15.0-ocabot-merge-pr-298-by-pedrobaeza-bump-minor, awaiting test results.

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Congratulations, your PR was merged at c15c6af. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot merged commit cdb19d0 into OCA:15.0 Dec 4, 2024
6 of 7 checks passed
@pedrobaeza pedrobaeza deleted the 15.0-rem-sale_report_salesperson_from_partner branch December 4, 2024 14:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants