Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

(don't review) testing to fix non-fips ltpa fat #30536

Draft
wants to merge 135 commits into
base: integration
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jimmy1wu
Copy link
Contributor

@jimmy1wu jimmy1wu commented Jan 10, 2025

** don't review this one pls **

jimmy1wu and others added 25 commits December 6, 2024 15:57
add com.ibm.ws.common.crypto trace
…eys and JVM options for FIPS (OpenLiberty#16)

* updating LibertyServer
….xml before server start

adding AEADBadTagException to AllowedFFDC list for tests which expect BadPaddingException

using jvm.options so that mbean invocations will use proper jvm parameters
updating server xml's with appropriate passwords, renaming serverFIPS…
@jimmy1wu jimmy1wu marked this pull request as draft January 10, 2025 23:14
@jimmy1wu
Copy link
Contributor Author

jimmy1wu commented Jan 10, 2025

!build
(view Open Liberty Personal Build - ⏳InProgress)
git.clone.checkout.branch=FIPSwork_01072025
git.clone.repository.username=JimmyWu

#spawn.fullfat.buckets=com.ibm.ws.security.token.ltpa_fat

Note: Target locations of links might be accessible only to IBM employees.

@LibbyBot
Copy link

Code analysis and actions

DO NOT DELETE THIS COMMENT.
  • 455 FAT files were changed, added, or removed.

  • Check that the build did not break the affected FAT suite(s).

  • 2 unit test files were changed.

  • Check that the build did not break the affected unit test suite(s).

  • 8 infrastructure code files were changed.

  • 9 test infrastructure code files were changed.

  • Test failures/errors in the build could be due to these changes.

  • 70 product code files were changed.

  • Please describe in a separate comment how you tested your changes.

  • 16 messages files were changed and need an L2 review.

  • @OpenLiberty/message-reviewer Please review.

    • dev/com.ibm.ws.crypto.common/resources/com/ibm/ws/crypto/common/resources/CryptoCommonMessages_zh_TW.nlsprops
    • dev/com.ibm.ws.crypto.common/resources/com/ibm/ws/crypto/common/resources/CryptoCommonMessages_it.nlsprops
    • dev/com.ibm.ws.crypto.common/resources/com/ibm/ws/crypto/common/resources/CryptoCommonMessages_zh.nlsprops
    • dev/com.ibm.ws.crypto.common/resources/com/ibm/ws/crypto/common/resources/CryptoCommonMessages_cs.nlsprops
    • dev/com.ibm.ws.crypto.common/resources/com/ibm/ws/crypto/common/resources/CryptoCommonMessages_ja.nlsprops
    • dev/com.ibm.ws.crypto.common/resources/com/ibm/ws/crypto/common/resources/CryptoCommonMessages_fr.nlsprops
    • dev/com.ibm.ws.crypto.common/resources/com/ibm/ws/crypto/common/resources/CryptoCommonMessages.nlsprops
    • dev/com.ibm.ws.kernel.service/resources/com/ibm/ws/kernel/pseudo/internal/resources/Messages.nlsprops
    • dev/com.ibm.ws.crypto.common/resources/com/ibm/ws/crypto/common/resources/CryptoCommonMessages_de.nlsprops
    • dev/com.ibm.ws.crypto.common/resources/com/ibm/ws/crypto/common/resources/CryptoCommonMessages_pt_BR.nlsprops
    • dev/com.ibm.ws.crypto.common/resources/com/ibm/ws/crypto/common/resources/CryptoCommonMessages_ro.nlsprops
    • dev/com.ibm.ws.crypto.common/resources/com/ibm/ws/crypto/common/resources/CryptoCommonMessages_ru.nlsprops
    • dev/com.ibm.ws.crypto.common/resources/com/ibm/ws/crypto/common/resources/CryptoCommonMessages_pl.nlsprops
    • dev/com.ibm.ws.crypto.common/resources/com/ibm/ws/crypto/common/resources/CryptoCommonMessages_hu.nlsprops
    • dev/com.ibm.ws.crypto.common/resources/com/ibm/ws/crypto/common/resources/CryptoCommonMessages_ko.nlsprops
    • dev/com.ibm.ws.crypto.common/resources/com/ibm/ws/crypto/common/resources/CryptoCommonMessages_es.nlsprops
  • 16 NLS files were changed and need an ID review.

  • @OpenLiberty/message-reviewer Please review.

    • dev/com.ibm.ws.crypto.common/resources/com/ibm/ws/crypto/common/resources/CryptoCommonMessages_zh_TW.nlsprops
    • dev/com.ibm.ws.crypto.common/resources/com/ibm/ws/crypto/common/resources/CryptoCommonMessages_it.nlsprops
    • dev/com.ibm.ws.crypto.common/resources/com/ibm/ws/crypto/common/resources/CryptoCommonMessages_zh.nlsprops
    • dev/com.ibm.ws.crypto.common/resources/com/ibm/ws/crypto/common/resources/CryptoCommonMessages_cs.nlsprops
    • dev/com.ibm.ws.crypto.common/resources/com/ibm/ws/crypto/common/resources/CryptoCommonMessages_ja.nlsprops
    • dev/com.ibm.ws.crypto.common/resources/com/ibm/ws/crypto/common/resources/CryptoCommonMessages_fr.nlsprops
    • dev/com.ibm.ws.crypto.common/resources/com/ibm/ws/crypto/common/resources/CryptoCommonMessages.nlsprops
    • dev/com.ibm.ws.kernel.service/resources/com/ibm/ws/kernel/pseudo/internal/resources/Messages.nlsprops
    • dev/com.ibm.ws.crypto.common/resources/com/ibm/ws/crypto/common/resources/CryptoCommonMessages_de.nlsprops
    • dev/com.ibm.ws.crypto.common/resources/com/ibm/ws/crypto/common/resources/CryptoCommonMessages_pt_BR.nlsprops
    • dev/com.ibm.ws.crypto.common/resources/com/ibm/ws/crypto/common/resources/CryptoCommonMessages_ro.nlsprops
    • dev/com.ibm.ws.crypto.common/resources/com/ibm/ws/crypto/common/resources/CryptoCommonMessages_ru.nlsprops
    • dev/com.ibm.ws.crypto.common/resources/com/ibm/ws/crypto/common/resources/CryptoCommonMessages_pl.nlsprops
    • dev/com.ibm.ws.crypto.common/resources/com/ibm/ws/crypto/common/resources/CryptoCommonMessages_hu.nlsprops
    • dev/com.ibm.ws.crypto.common/resources/com/ibm/ws/crypto/common/resources/CryptoCommonMessages_ko.nlsprops
    • dev/com.ibm.ws.crypto.common/resources/com/ibm/ws/crypto/common/resources/CryptoCommonMessages_es.nlsprops

@LibbyBot
Copy link

Please code review feature-related files, @OpenLiberty/delivery-approvers

@jimmy1wu jimmy1wu changed the title testing to fix non-fips ltpa fat (don't review) testing to fix non-fips ltpa fat Jan 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants