Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feat/rover simulation #158

Closed
wants to merge 14 commits into from
Closed

Feat/rover simulation #158

wants to merge 14 commits into from

Conversation

davidcalderon03
Copy link
Member

@davidcalderon03 davidcalderon03 commented Jan 21, 2024

Description

This PR does the following:

  • Adds the option of using a simple diff drive robot instead of the complex 6-wheeled rover
  • Refactors code related to navigation, setting up urc_navigation as the home of all config and launch files related to localization and navigation
  • Ensures functionality of ros2 control and gazebo

Fixes #{{ https://app.clickup.com/t/86az1q5bh }}

Testing Steps

  • colcon build --symlink-install
  • . install/setup.bash
  • ros2 launch urc_bringup bringup.launch.py

Expectation: This should spin up Gazebo, ROS2 Conrol, RViz, and the EKF node

NOTES:
These fixes need to be made:
[ERROR] [1705871675.218470482] [rviz2]: The link is static or has unrealistic inertia, so the equivalent inertia box will not be shown.
This is because of the inertia on the rover footprint

Gazebo ROS2 Not Running:
The controller manager is not working

Design Presentation: N/A0

Self Checklist

  • [x ] I have formatted my code using ament_uncrustify --reformat
  • [ x] I have tested that the new behavior works

KeseterG and others added 9 commits January 13, 2024 11:21
- xacro: fix damping and friction, reorganize
- config file: change config file location to be found only in urc_bringup
- launch files: create simulation.launch.py in urc_bringup for unified access
- control simulation from hardware_config.yaml
@davidcalderon03 davidcalderon03 deleted the feat/rover_simulation branch January 27, 2024 16:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants