You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
as many values can be checked using exercise type values, we should allow for flexible (and selective) testing of each value individually. Consider that the following "things" can be defined for each value to be checked:
type
tolerance
tolerance_type
custom messages, hints, etc
in the current implementation, each of these things are added to the dict as a single value, but could also be specified as a list with same length as values. For example, the following would provide a different absolute tolerance and type for each value in values:
as many values can be checked using exercise type values, we should allow for flexible (and selective) testing of each value individually. Consider that the following "things" can be defined for each value to be checked:
in the current implementation, each of these things are added to the dict as a single value, but could also be specified as a list with same length as values. For example, the following would provide a different absolute tolerance and type for each value in values:
Note the list of lists for the
types
key, allowing values[1] to have 2 types.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: