Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update libs-non-major #466

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jan 2, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@eslint/js (source) 9.17.0 -> 9.18.0 age adoption passing confidence
@google/clasp 2.4.2 -> 2.5.0 age adoption passing confidence
@types/google-apps-script (source) 1.0.89 -> 1.0.91 age adoption passing confidence
@types/node (source) 22.10.2 -> 22.10.7 age adoption passing confidence
@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin (source) 8.18.2 -> 8.20.0 age adoption passing confidence
@typescript-eslint/parser (source) 8.18.2 -> 8.20.0 age adoption passing confidence
concurrently 9.1.0 -> 9.1.2 age adoption passing confidence
eslint (source) 9.17.0 -> 9.18.0 age adoption passing confidence
eslint-plugin-prettier 5.2.1 -> 5.2.2 age adoption passing confidence
rollup (source) 4.29.1 -> 4.30.1 age adoption passing confidence
type-fest 4.31.0 -> 4.32.0 age adoption passing confidence
typescript (source) 5.7.2 -> 5.7.3 age adoption passing confidence
typescript-eslint (source) 8.18.2 -> 8.20.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

eslint/eslint (@​eslint/js)

v9.18.0

Compare Source

google/clasp (@​google/clasp)

v2.5.0

Compare Source

Features
Bug Fixes
  • Don't write files on clone if unable to fetch project (#​824) (b3b292a)
  • Rethrow error so command exits with error status (#​1019) (29ac629)
typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin)

v8.20.0

Compare Source

🚀 Features
  • eslint-plugin: [consistent-type-assertions] add arrayLiteralTypeAssertions options (#​10565)
  • eslint-plugin: [no-deprecated] add allow options (#​10585)
  • eslint-plugin: [no-misused-spread] add new rule (#​10551)
🩹 Fixes
  • eslint-plugin: [no-unnecessary-condition] don't flag optional chaining for union types with an unconstrained type parameters (#​10602)
  • eslint-plugin: [no-shadow] ignore ordering of type declarations (#​10593)
❤️ Thank You

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v8.19.1

Compare Source

🩹 Fixes
  • eslint-plugin: [no-unnecessary-type-assertion] handle literal types (#​10523)
  • eslint-plugin: [no-deprecated] doesn't report on shorthand property in an object expression (#​10550)
  • eslint-plugin: [strict-boolean-expressions] remove remaining (unsafe) autofixes (#​10548)
  • eslint-plugin: [no-shadow] report correctly on parameters of functions declared with the declare keyword (#​10543)
  • eslint-plugin: [no-base-to-string] check array generic type (#​10437)
❤️ Thank You
  • Kirk Waiblinger
  • mdm317
  • Ronen Amiel
  • Yukihiro Hasegawa @​y-hsgw

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v8.19.0

Compare Source

🚀 Features
  • eslint-plugin: [strict-boolean-expressions] check array predicate functions' return statements (#​10106)
🩹 Fixes
  • eslint-plugin: [member-ordering] ignore method overloading (#​10536)
  • eslint-plugin: [consistent-indexed-object-style] don't report on indirect circular references (#​10537)
  • eslint-plugin: [array-type] autofix with conditional types needs parentheses (#​10522)
  • eslint-plugin: add getConstraintInfo to handle generic constraints better (#​10496)
❤️ Thank You

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/parser)

v8.20.0

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for parser to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v8.19.1

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for parser to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v8.19.0

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for parser to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

open-cli-tools/concurrently (concurrently)

v9.1.2

Compare Source

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: open-cli-tools/concurrently@v9.1.1...v9.1.2

v9.1.1

Compare Source

What's Changed

Full Changelog: open-cli-tools/concurrently@v9.1.0...v9.1.1

eslint/eslint (eslint)

v9.18.0

Compare Source

prettier/eslint-plugin-prettier (eslint-plugin-prettier)

v5.2.2

Compare Source

Patch Changes
rollup/rollup (rollup)

v4.30.1

Compare Source

2025-01-07

Bug Fixes
  • Prevent invalid code when simplifying unary expressions in switch cases (#​5786)
Pull Requests

v4.30.0

Compare Source

2025-01-06

Features
  • Inline values of resolvable unary expressions for improved tree-shaking (#​5775)
Pull Requests

v4.29.2

Compare Source

2025-01-05

Bug Fixes
  • Keep import attributes when using dynamic ESM import() expressions from CommonJS (#​5781)
Pull Requests
sindresorhus/type-fest (type-fest)

v4.32.0

Compare Source

New types
Improvements
Fixes
  • SetRequired: Fix support for removal of optional modifiers from tuples (#​1030) c897aad

microsoft/TypeScript (typescript)

v5.7.3

Compare Source

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (typescript-eslint)

v8.20.0

Compare Source

🚀 Features
  • eslint-plugin: [no-misused-spread] add new rule (#​10551)
❤️ Thank You
  • Josh Goldberg ✨

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v8.19.1

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for typescript-eslint to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v8.19.0

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for typescript-eslint to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "on thursday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/libs-non-major branch from 31099ad to 5a9de7e Compare January 2, 2025 10:41
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/libs-non-major branch from 5a9de7e to 60d42b5 Compare January 2, 2025 22:58
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/libs-non-major branch from 60d42b5 to 72e3654 Compare January 3, 2025 09:07
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/libs-non-major branch from 72e3654 to 6929a57 Compare January 5, 2025 12:27
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/libs-non-major branch from 6929a57 to e7db3c7 Compare January 6, 2025 07:06
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/libs-non-major branch from e7db3c7 to 87f6e2d Compare January 8, 2025 14:43
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/libs-non-major branch from 87f6e2d to ce910e8 Compare January 8, 2025 22:40
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/libs-non-major branch from ce910e8 to 6b9abcb Compare January 9, 2025 06:42
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/libs-non-major branch from 6b9abcb to 86dd298 Compare January 10, 2025 21:48
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/libs-non-major branch from 86dd298 to c4a045e Compare January 11, 2025 01:53
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/libs-non-major branch from c4a045e to 188b9ee Compare January 13, 2025 21:47
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/libs-non-major branch from 188b9ee to 1d8dbcd Compare January 15, 2025 06:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants