Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump ts 1.4.10 #361

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 16, 2025
Merged

Bump ts 1.4.10 #361

merged 3 commits into from
Jan 16, 2025

Conversation

peze
Copy link
Contributor

@peze peze commented Jan 16, 2025

No description provided.

@peze peze merged commit 3cece40 into master Jan 16, 2025
37 of 44 checks passed
@peze peze deleted the bump-ts-1.4.10 branch January 16, 2025 07:58
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jan 16, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 71.62%. Comparing base (36ba0a0) to head (3dfb935).
Report is 4 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master     #361      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     71.55%   71.62%   +0.06%     
  Complexity      236      236              
============================================
  Files            14       14              
  Lines          1431     1431              
  Branches         46       46              
============================================
+ Hits           1024     1025       +1     
+ Misses          394      393       -1     
  Partials         13       13              
Flag Coverage Δ
golang 91.70% <ø> (ø)
java 65.17% <ø> (+0.34%) ⬆️
php 0.00% <ø> (ø)
python 98.63% <ø> (ø)
ts 96.11% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants