HDDS-11900. obs granular lock for existing request #7647
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
kerneltime
added
the
om-pre-ratis-execution
kerneltime
requested review from
kerneltime,
szetszwo,
aswinshakil,
errose28,
swamirishi and
ChenSammi
sumitagrawl
force-pushed
the
HDDS-11900
branch
from
65b8547 to
c6dda89
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Granular locking for OBS for existing flow.
locking is added for external request at entry point. This provides execution of request at leader and existing flow simultaneouly without impacting for cache.
locking added for obs request(HDDS-11898. design doc leader side execution)Step-by-step integrationof existing request (interoperability)Parent Jira:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-11897
What is the link to the Apache JIRA
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-11900
How was this patch tested?