Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Use correct type union in CRD spec for Quantity fields #4013

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

heckler1
Copy link

This fix sets the expected types based on the current K8S upstream OpenAPI v3 types: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/release-1.32/api/openapi-spec/v3/api__v1_openapi.json#L8637

This fix sets the expected types based on the current K8S upstream OpenAPI v3 types:
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/release-1.32/api/openapi-spec/v3/api__v1_openapi.json#L8637

Signed-off-by: Stephen Heckler <[email protected]>
@heckler1 heckler1 force-pushed the heckler1/fixQuantityType branch from e7fa895 to 6d74059 Compare December 18, 2024 16:06
@heckler1 heckler1 changed the title fix(: Use correct type union in CRD spec for Quantity fields fix: Use correct type union in CRD spec for Quantity fields Dec 18, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

Published E2E Test Results

0 tests   0 ✅  0s ⏱️
0 suites  0 💤
0 files    0 ❌

Results for commit cc597cd.

Copy link
Contributor

Published Unit Test Results

2 293 tests   2 293 ✅  2m 59s ⏱️
  128 suites      0 💤
    1 files        0 ❌

Results for commit cc597cd.

@heckler1
Copy link
Author

Hmm, this doesn't seem to pass e2e, I'll iterate locally, sorry for the noise!

@heckler1 heckler1 closed this Dec 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant