ci: Use uv based workflow #217
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
XavierChanth
previously approved these changes
Jan 8, 2025
XavierChanth
approved these changes
Jan 8, 2025
This was referenced Jan 9, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As Actions moves
ubuntu-latesttoubuntu-24.04we need to have a workflow that doesn't try topip installinto the default namespace, as that's now protected.- What I did
Rather than having a statically generated
requirements.txtit's now created frompoetry.lockand then installed into auvcreated venv usinguv.- How I did it
Tested in https://github.com/cpswan/uv_python_workflow
- How to verify it
CI from this PR should use new approach.
- Description for the changelog
ci: Use uv based workflow