-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 128
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Test/more panic err #829
Test/more panic err #829
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces enhancements to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #829 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 45.04% 45.03% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 113 113
Lines 6394 6395 +1
==========================================
Hits 2880 2880
- Misses 3379 3380 +1
Partials 135 135
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
x/logic/keeper/grpc_query_ask_test.go (2)
Line range hint
26-189
: Consider enhancing test documentation with categorized test cases.While the test cases are comprehensive, grouping them with descriptive comments would improve readability. Consider organizing test cases into logical categories such as:
- Basic query validation
- Error handling scenarios
- Resource limit validation
- Predicate filtering
Example structure:
func TestGRPCAsk(t *testing.T) { emptySolution := types.Result{} Convey("Given a test cases", t, func() { cases := []struct { + // Test case metadata + description string // Brief description of what the test validates + category string // Category of test: basic, error, limits, etc. + program string query string limit uint64
183-189
: Consider adding boundary test cases for variable limits.While the current test case validates exceeding the variable limit, consider adding these edge cases:
- Test with exactly maxVariables (boundary condition)
- Test with concurrent queries to validate behavior under load
Example test case:
{ program: "l(L) :- length(L, 999).", query: "l(L).", maxVariables: 1000, expectedAnswer: &types.Answer{ Variables: []string{"L"}, Results: []types.Result{/* expected result */}, }, },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
x/logic/keeper/grpc_query_ask_test.go
(1 hunks)x/logic/util/prolog.go
(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
x/logic/keeper/grpc_query_ask_test.go (2)
Pattern **/*.go
: Review the Go code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.
Pattern **/*_test.go
: Review tests to ensure they follow GoConvey style, using a behavioral and data-driven approach.
x/logic/util/prolog.go (1)
Pattern **/*.go
: Review the Go code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.
🔇 Additional comments (2)
x/logic/util/prolog.go (1)
67-67
: LGTM: Error handling enhancement looks good
The updated error handling with the simplified isPanicError
call maintains clean error propagation while properly wrapping the panic error with LimitExceeded
.
x/logic/keeper/grpc_query_ask_test.go (1)
183-189
: LGTM! Well-structured test case for variable limit validation.
The test case effectively validates the system's behavior when approaching the variable limit through recursive list generation. It follows the established table-driven test pattern and maintains consistency with other test cases.
@coderabbitai resolve |
✅ Actions performedComments resolved and changes approved. |
Use an isolated env when unifying panic errors with error template (prevents unintended side effects). Come with an additional test case.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Ask
method to validate behavior with specific Prolog-like queries.Bug Fixes
Ask
method, ensuring appropriate error messages are returned.Refactor
isPanicError
function by removing unnecessary parameters and streamlining error handling in theQueryInterpreter
function.