Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove unimplemented codes & Lint Fixes #37

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Dec 19, 2024
Merged

Remove unimplemented codes & Lint Fixes #37

merged 5 commits into from
Dec 19, 2024

Conversation

mertssmnoglu
Copy link
Collaborator

@mertssmnoglu mertssmnoglu commented Dec 19, 2024

  • New Features

  • Bug Fixes

    • Updated variable naming for consistency in the API configuration.
    • Removed unimplemented WebSocket handler for metrics streaming.
  • Documentation

    • Enhanced naming conventions across various metrics-related functions and types for better clarity.
  • Chores

    • Removed unnecessary dependency on the Gorilla WebSocket package.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new GitHub Actions workflow for linting code on pull requests.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Corrected variable naming inconsistencies in API configurations.
    • Removed deprecated WebSocket handler for metrics streaming.
  • Documentation

    • Updated naming conventions across various metrics-related functions and types for consistency.
  • Chores

    • Removed unnecessary dependency on the Gorilla WebSocket package.

- use: 'golangci/golangci-lint-action'
@mertssmnoglu mertssmnoglu added the ci-cd This issue or pull request regarding the CI/CD pipeline label Dec 19, 2024
@mertssmnoglu mertssmnoglu self-assigned this Dec 19, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 19, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces a comprehensive set of changes focused on code consistency and naming conventions across multiple files. The modifications primarily involve renaming variables, functions, and structs to follow a more standardized capitalization approach, particularly for acronyms like API and CPU. A new GitHub Actions workflow for linting has been added, and the WebSocket handler has been removed. The changes span configuration files, metric handling, and system-level interactions, ensuring a more uniform codebase structure.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/lint.yml New GitHub Actions workflow for linting Go code
cmd/capture/main.go Updated API secret naming, added server read header timeout, removed WebSocket endpoint
go.mod Removed gorilla/websocket dependency
internal/config/config.go Renamed ApiSecret to APISecret
internal/handler/metrics.go Updated naming conventions for API response and metrics
internal/handler/websocket.go Completely removed WebSocket handler
internal/metric/cpu.go Renamed functions and types to use consistent capitalization
internal/metric/disk.go Initialized checkedSlice with explicit capacity
internal/metric/metric.go Updated type and struct names
internal/metric/metric_math.go Renamed parameter in RandomIntPtr function
internal/sysfs/cpu.go Renamed CPU-related functions for consistency
internal/sysfs/exec.go Modified error message capitalization in ShellExec function

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • ajhollid

Poem

🐰 A Rabbit's Refactoring Rhyme 🔧
With camelCase and naming bright,
Our code now shines with pure delight
No more WebSockets, lint's in place
Consistency wins this coding race!
Hop, hop, hooray for clean design! 🚀


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bce26b2 and ba2ab5f.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • internal/metric/disk.go (2 hunks)
  • internal/metric/metric.go (6 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • internal/metric/disk.go
  • internal/metric/metric.go

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/lint.yml (1)

10-12: Add job timeout and Go version setup

Consider adding a timeout for the lint job and specify the Go version for consistency.

   lint:
     runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+    timeout-minutes: 10
     steps:
+      - uses: actions/setup-go@v4
+        with:
+          go-version: '1.21'
internal/metric/cpu.go (1)

Line range hint 30-38: Consider tracking TODOs in issues.

The struct has TODO comments for implementing read and write speed metrics. These could be tracked as GitHub issues for better visibility and follow-up.

Would you like me to create GitHub issues to track the implementation of these metrics?

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 11690fe and bce26b2.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (12)
  • .github/workflows/lint.yml (1 hunks)
  • cmd/capture/main.go (3 hunks)
  • go.mod (0 hunks)
  • internal/config/config.go (2 hunks)
  • internal/handler/metrics.go (2 hunks)
  • internal/handler/websocket.go (0 hunks)
  • internal/metric/cpu.go (4 hunks)
  • internal/metric/disk.go (1 hunks)
  • internal/metric/metric.go (5 hunks)
  • internal/metric/metric_math.go (1 hunks)
  • internal/sysfs/cpu.go (3 hunks)
  • internal/sysfs/exec.go (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
  • go.mod
  • internal/handler/websocket.go
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • internal/sysfs/exec.go
🔇 Additional comments (13)
.github/workflows/lint.yml (1)

3-7: LGTM: Branch trigger configuration looks good

The workflow is correctly configured to run on pull requests targeting main and develop branches.

internal/config/config.go (1)

7-7: LGTM: Consistent acronym capitalization

The renaming of ApiSecret to APISecret follows Go's convention for acronym capitalization.

Let's verify that all references to this field have been updated consistently:

Also applies to: 25-25, 32-32

✅ Verification successful

All references to APISecret are properly updated

The codebase shows consistent usage of the field:

  • Struct field is correctly capitalized as APISecret
  • Function parameter uses camelCase apiSecret as per Go conventions
  • Field access uses the correct APISecret capitalization
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining instances of "ApiSecret" that might have been missed
rg -i "apisecret" --type go

Length of output: 371


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual context of these occurrences to ensure proper casing
rg -i "apisecret" --type go -C 2

Length of output: 1451

internal/handler/metrics.go (2)

13-16: LGTM: Proper error handling with APIResponse

The error handling logic with status codes is maintained while updating to the new APIResponse type.


25-26: LGTM: Consistent CPU acronym capitalization

The update to use CollectCPUMetrics() follows Go's convention for acronym capitalization.

Let's verify all CPU-related naming has been updated consistently:

✅ Verification successful

Let me check the actual implementation to ensure complete consistency in CPU naming.


CPU acronym capitalization is consistently used throughout the codebase

After reviewing all CPU-related code, the capitalization is consistent across:

  • Function names: CollectCPUMetrics, CPUTemperature, CPUCurrentFrequency
  • Type names: CPUData
  • Variable names and struct fields using CPU as prefix or suffix
  • API endpoints and handler names
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining instances of "Cpu" in function/type names
rg -l "Cpu[A-Z]" --type go

# Search for the new CPU metric collector usage
ast-grep --pattern 'CollectCPUMetrics()'

Length of output: 136


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any occurrences of "cpu" (case-insensitive) in go files
rg -i "cpu" --type go -A 2

# Look for struct/type definitions containing CPU
ast-grep --pattern 'type $_ struct {
  $$$
  CPU $$$
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 7229

internal/metric/metric_math.go (1)

23-24: LGTM: Parameter rename improves clarity

The rename from max to maximum makes the parameter name more descriptive and aligns with Go naming conventions.

cmd/capture/main.go (3)

26-26: LGTM: APISecret naming follows Go conventions

The rename from ApiSecret to APISecret correctly follows Go's convention of keeping acronyms uppercase.


39-41: LGTM: Added security timeout for header reading

The addition of ReadHeaderTimeout is a good security practice to prevent Slowloris-type attacks.


58-60: Verify shutdown behavior

The shutdown logic has been simplified. Please ensure this change doesn't affect graceful shutdown of ongoing requests.

✅ Verification successful

Let me check the actual implementation details around the shutdown logic to better understand the changes.


Let me check the previous implementation to understand what has changed in the shutdown logic.


Let me try a different approach to check the server shutdown implementation.


Shutdown implementation follows standard patterns and appears safe

The shutdown logic implements a proper graceful shutdown pattern with:

  • Signal handling for SIGINT/SIGTERM
  • Context timeout of 5 seconds for pending requests
  • Server.Shutdown() call to stop accepting new requests
  • Error handling for shutdown failures
  • Goroutine for server operation

The implementation follows Go's recommended practices for graceful HTTP server shutdown and should properly handle ongoing requests.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any tests verifying shutdown behavior
rg -l "shutdown|graceful" --type go

Length of output: 57


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Get the context around shutdown logic in main.go
rg -B 5 -A 5 "shutdown|graceful|ctx.Done" cmd/capture/main.go

Length of output: 618


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Get the git history of the shutdown logic changes
git log -L '/ctx.Done/,/timeout of 5 seconds/':cmd/capture/main.go

Length of output: 0


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Look for the serve function implementation and server shutdown related code
rg -A 10 "func serve" cmd/capture/main.go

Length of output: 202

internal/sysfs/cpu.go (2)

25-25: LGTM: CPU acronym capitalization follows Go conventions

The renaming of functions to use uppercase "CPU" follows Go's convention for acronyms:

  • readCpuFreqFilereadCPUFreqFile
  • CpuTemperatureCPUTemperature
  • CpuCurrentFrequencyCPUCurrentFrequency

Also applies to: 39-39, 77-77


78-78: Verify all CPU function references are updated

Ensure all callers of these functions have been updated to use the new names.

✅ Verification successful

Based on the search results, I can generate the final response as we have comprehensive information about all CPU-related references in the codebase.

All CPU references are consistently using uppercase format

The codebase shows consistent usage of uppercase "CPU" in all relevant function names, types, and variables. The only lowercase usage is in filesystem paths which is correct. No inconsistencies or outdated references were found.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining lowercase 'Cpu' references
rg "Cpu" --type go

# Search for the new uppercase 'CPU' references to verify updates
rg "CPU" --type go

Length of output: 1539

internal/metric/disk.go (1)

23-23: LGTM! Good optimization.

Pre-allocating the slice with a reasonable capacity of 10 is a good optimization that reduces potential reallocations.

internal/metric/cpu.go (1)

10-10: LGTM! Consistent naming conventions.

The renaming changes align with Go's standard naming conventions where acronyms should be capitalized (CPU instead of Cpu).

Also applies to: 63-63, 73-73, 82-82

internal/metric/metric.go (1)

11-11: LGTM! Consistent naming conventions.

The changes consistently apply Go's standard naming conventions across:

  • Renaming ApiResponse to APIResponse
  • Renaming CpuData to CPUData
  • Updating struct field from Cpu to CPU
  • Updating function calls to match new names

Also applies to: 17-17, 30-30, 40-40, 71-71, 95-95

.github/workflows/lint.yml Show resolved Hide resolved
internal/metric/metric_math.go Show resolved Hide resolved
@mertssmnoglu mertssmnoglu changed the title ci: add lint.yml Remove unimplemented codes & Lint Fixes Dec 19, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@ajhollid ajhollid left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice catches, good naming conventions now 👍

@mertssmnoglu mertssmnoglu added this to the v1.0 milestone Dec 19, 2024
@ajhollid ajhollid merged commit e984e73 into develop Dec 19, 2024
2 checks passed
@ajhollid ajhollid deleted the ci/lint branch December 19, 2024 18:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ci-cd This issue or pull request regarding the CI/CD pipeline
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants