Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adjusted to support multitenancy #141

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Adjusted to support multitenancy #141

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

danjoa
Copy link
Contributor

@danjoa danjoa commented Dec 12, 2024

No description provided.

@danjoa danjoa requested review from chgeo and nkaputnik December 12, 2024 15:32
});
} else {
keys.push(e);
if (!entity['@changelog.disable_assoc']) { // REVISIT: why do we need that annotation?
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a flag to disable automatic association definition. This is for people who want to change-track things, but don't want the change-log to be attached to the entity itself. They rather build a central Admin UI to view all changes.
One of the reasons is also, that ALL changes are visible through this association, regardless of who did them, something some stakeholders see as security issue

if(!entity['@changelog.disable_facet'])
entity['@UI.Facets']?.push(facet)
// Add UI.Facet for Change History List
if (!entity['@changelog.disable_facet']) // REVISIT: why do we need that annotation?
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As above, this was actually the most requested feature from the users...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants