first draft commit #601
first draft commit #601
Conversation
|
Important Review skippedDraft detected. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![github-advanced-security[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/57789?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| return nil, ErrUsernameAlreadyTaken | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| fmt.Printf("user: %#v\n", user) |
Check failure
Code scanning / CodeQL
Clear-text logging of sensitive information High
Show autofix suggestion
Hide autofix suggestion
Copilot Autofix AI 5 days ago
To fix the problem, we need to ensure that sensitive information such as passwords is not logged in clear text. Instead, we should either obfuscate the sensitive information or omit it entirely from the logs. In this case, we will omit the password from the logs to prevent any potential exposure of sensitive data.
We will modify the logging statement on line 48 to exclude the password field from the user object. This can be done by creating a copy of the user object with the password field set to an obfuscated value (e.g., "****") before logging it.
| @@ -47,3 +47,5 @@ | ||
|
|
||
| fmt.Printf("user: %#v\n", user) | ||
| userCopy := *user | ||
| userCopy.Password = "****" | ||
| fmt.Printf("user: %#v\n", userCopy) | ||
|
|
| return nil, err | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| fmt.Printf("user.Password: `%s`\n", user.Password) |
Check failure
Code scanning / CodeQL
Clear-text logging of sensitive information High
Show autofix suggestion
Hide autofix suggestion
Copilot Autofix AI 5 days ago
To fix the problem, we should remove the logging of the password in clear text. Instead, we can log a message indicating that an authentication attempt was made without revealing the actual password. This way, we maintain the ability to debug authentication issues without exposing sensitive information.
- Remove the lines that log the password in clear text.
- Add a log message that indicates an authentication attempt without revealing the password.
| @@ -68,4 +68,3 @@ | ||
|
|
||
| fmt.Printf("user.Password: `%s`\n", user.Password) | ||
| fmt.Printf("password: `%s`\n", password) | ||
| fmt.Println("Authentication attempt for user:", username) | ||
| if err := bcrypt.CompareHashAndPassword([]byte(user.Password), []byte(password)); err != nil { |
| } | ||
|
|
||
| fmt.Printf("user.Password: `%s`\n", user.Password) | ||
| fmt.Printf("password: `%s`\n", password) |
Check failure
Code scanning / CodeQL
Clear-text logging of sensitive information High
Show autofix suggestion
Hide autofix suggestion
Copilot Autofix AI 5 days ago
To fix the problem, we need to ensure that sensitive information such as passwords is not logged in clear text. Instead, we should either obfuscate the password or avoid logging it altogether. The best way to fix this without changing existing functionality is to remove the logging of the password entirely, as it is not necessary for the application's functionality.
We will make changes to the internal/api/v1/services/user.go file, specifically to the Authenticate method, to remove the logging of the password variable.
| @@ -68,4 +68,4 @@ | ||
|
|
||
| fmt.Printf("user.Password: `%s`\n", user.Password) | ||
| fmt.Printf("password: `%s`\n", password) | ||
| // fmt.Printf("user.Password: `%s`\n", user.Password) | ||
| // fmt.Printf("password: `%s`\n", password) | ||
| if err := bcrypt.CompareHashAndPassword([]byte(user.Password), []byte(password)); err != nil { |
| } | ||
|
|
||
| logFile, err := os.OpenFile( | ||
| filepath.Join(s.logsPath, fmt.Sprintf("%s.log", test.Scope)), |
Check failure
Code scanning / CodeQL
Uncontrolled data used in path expression High test
Show autofix suggestion
Hide autofix suggestion
Copilot Autofix AI 3 days ago
To fix the problem, we need to validate the test.Scope value before using it to construct a file path. The validation should ensure that the test.Scope does not contain any path separators or parent directory references. This can be achieved by checking for the presence of "/" or "\" characters and ".." sequences in the test.Scope value. If any of these are found, the input should be rejected.
| @@ -244,2 +244,7 @@ | ||
|
|
||
| // Validate test.Scope to ensure it does not contain path separators or parent directory references | ||
| if strings.Contains(test.Scope, "/") || strings.Contains(test.Scope, "\\") || strings.Contains(test.Scope, "..") { | ||
| return fmt.Errorf("invalid scope: %s", test.Scope) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| _, ok := s.knuuList[test.UserID][test.Scope] |
Closes #583