Skip to content

Issues: cplusplus/sender-receiver

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

145 Open 95 Closed
145 Open 95 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

The operation_state concept can be simplified bug Something isn't working P1
#312 opened Jan 14, 2025 by ericniebler
stopped_as_optional tests constraints satisfaction of self instead of child bug Something isn't working P0
#311 opened Jan 14, 2025 by ericniebler
should we be using FWD-ENV in impls-for<as_variant_t>::get-state ?
#310 opened Jan 13, 2025 by ericniebler
with-await-transform::await_transform should not use a deduced return type
#309 opened Jan 7, 2025 by t3nsor
constraints on user customizations of standard sender algorithms are incorrectly specified bug Something isn't working P1
#308 opened Jan 2, 2025 by ericniebler
specification of completion-signatures-for in [exec.snd.expos]/p39 is recursive bug Something isn't working P0
#307 opened Dec 31, 2024 by ericniebler
1
restore the enable_sender boolean variable template bug Something isn't working P0
#306 opened Dec 5, 2024 by ericniebler
schedule_from isn't starting the schedule sender if decay-copying results throws
#304 opened Nov 21, 2024 by ericniebler
Add execution::invoke() algorithm enhancement New feature or request good-first-issue Something to try if you're new to the project P1
#303 opened Nov 18, 2024 by lewissbaker
Relax when_all to allow other stop-token implementations than inplace_stop_token design discussion We need to talk about this; there's nothing actionable here yet P0
#302 opened Nov 7, 2024 by lewissbaker
2
Example 1.5.1 "then" doesn't seem to work.
#301 opened Oct 31, 2024 by aaron-michaux
3
when_all/split: operation state might get prematurely destroyed when child completes synchronously inside its stop callback
#300 opened Oct 23, 2024 by jiixyj
10
sync_wait should work with just_stopped() and just_error(e).
#299 opened Oct 22, 2024 by BenFrantzDale
when_all should be described explicitly as not intrinsically parallel
#298 opened Oct 22, 2024 by BenFrantzDale
1
when_all(just()) shouldn’t have a set_stopped_t() completion signature design needs-paper Needs a paper to be written P0
#297 opened Oct 22, 2024 by BenFrantzDale
get_env() specified in terms of as_const() but this doesn't work with rvalue senders bug Something isn't working P0 pending-wg21 A paper or an LWG issue exits wording
#296 opened Oct 22, 2024 by lewissbaker
3
Should when_all and split check the receiver's stop token for stop_requested() and call set_stopped?
#295 opened Oct 18, 2024 by jiixyj
@lewissbaker @ericniebler
run_loop::schedule() should not have set_stopped_t() in its completion signatures if passed an env with an unstoppable_token design P0 wording
#294 opened Oct 16, 2024 by lewissbaker
run_loop::run-loop-sender should remove the item from the list when a stop-request is sent design discussion We need to talk about this; there's nothing actionable here yet P0 processed processed in a meeting
#293 opened Oct 15, 2024 by lewissbaker
7
Does basic-receiver need to constrain set_value/set_error/set_stopped on whether complete is invocable? discussion We need to talk about this; there's nothing actionable here yet wording
#292 opened Oct 15, 2024 by lewissbaker
env and prop are relying on deprecated behavior bug Something isn't working P1
#291 opened Oct 14, 2024 by ericniebler
execution::split: Conflict between shared_state<Child_Sndr> and shared_state<Out_Sndr>
#290 opened Oct 4, 2024 by mochunshuang
1
should queries be required to have a UUID so that there is a global canonical ordering? design discussion We need to talk about this; there's nothing actionable here yet needs-paper Needs a paper to be written P0
#289 opened Aug 28, 2024 by ericniebler
2
Should let_value destroy its predecessor operation-state eagerly to allow storage reuse? design discussion We need to talk about this; there's nothing actionable here yet P0
#287 opened Aug 14, 2024 by lewissbaker
2
Why do we allow directly querying schedulers, but require receivers to return a separate environment object? design P0
#286 opened Aug 13, 2024 by lewissbaker
ProTip! Exclude everything labeled bug with -label:bug.