Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(PocketIC): new call response types #3425

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Jan 16, 2025
Merged

Conversation

mraszyk
Copy link
Contributor

@mraszyk mraszyk commented Jan 13, 2025

This PR implements new PocketIC call response types following this forum proposal.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the feat label Jan 13, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@michael-weigelt michael-weigelt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Neat improvement, I think. Thanks

@mraszyk mraszyk marked this pull request as ready for review January 16, 2025 10:03
@mraszyk mraszyk requested review from a team as code owners January 16, 2025 10:03
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If this pull request affects the behavior of any canister owned by
the Governance team, remember to update the corresponding
unreleased_changes.md file(s).

To acknowldge this reminder (and unblock the PR), dismiss this
code review by going to the bottom of the pull request page, and
supply one of the following reasons:

  1. Done.

  2. No canister behavior changes.

@mraszyk mraszyk enabled auto-merge January 16, 2025 16:38
@mraszyk mraszyk added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 16, 2025
Merged via the queue into master with commit 2c79ddc Jan 16, 2025
26 checks passed
@mraszyk mraszyk deleted the mraszyk/pic-call-response-types branch January 16, 2025 17:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants