Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update explainer.mdx #1275

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 23, 2025
Merged

Update explainer.mdx #1275

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 23, 2025

Conversation

zainbacchus
Copy link
Contributor

Matching description in #1273

Matching description in #1273
@zainbacchus zainbacchus marked this pull request as ready for review January 23, 2025 20:46
@zainbacchus zainbacchus requested a review from a team as a code owner January 23, 2025 20:46
Copy link

netlify bot commented Jan 23, 2025

Deploy Preview for docs-optimism ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit dd37446
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/docs-optimism/deploys/6792aaa822e7fd000802ab80
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1275--docs-optimism.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 23, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the documentation for the OP Stack's interoperability explainer, focusing on refining the description of interoperability benefits. The changes primarily involve rephrasing and expanding the explanation of asset movement across chains. The updated text provides a more detailed description of how ETH and ERC-20 tokens can move securely between chains through native minting and burning processes. A new benefit has been added that highlights the ability of applications to compose with data existing on other chains, thereby enhancing the overall interoperability capabilities. The structural integrity of the document remains unchanged, with the modifications aimed at providing a clearer and more comprehensive understanding of the OP Stack's interoperability features.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • krofax
  • sbvegan

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
pages/stack/interop/explainer.mdx (2)

26-26: Improve sentence structure and punctuation.

The current text combines two distinct points into a single sentence using a period. For better readability and adherence to documentation guidelines, consider using a semicolon or splitting into separate list items.

-*   ETH and ERC-20 tokens to move securely between chains via native minting and burning.  Asset interoperability solves the issues of liquidity fragmentation and poor user experiences caused by asset wrapping or liquidity pools. 
+*   ETH and ERC-20 tokens to move securely between chains via native minting and burning; this asset interoperability solves the issues of liquidity fragmentation and poor user experiences caused by asset wrapping or liquidity pools.

27-27: Enhance clarity of the cross-chain data composition benefit.

The current statement is too concise and might benefit from additional context about the practical implications of cross-chain data composition.

-*   Apps to compose with data that exist on other chains.
+*   Apps to compose with data that exists on other chains, enabling cross-chain functionality without intermediary bridges or external oracles.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 29eecc7 and dd37446.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pages/stack/interop/explainer.mdx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
pages/stack/interop/explainer.mdx (1)

Pattern **/*.mdx: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:

  • Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
  • Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
  • Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
  • Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
  • Apply the Oxford comma.
  • Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
  • Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
  • For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
    1. Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
    2. Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
    3. Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
  • Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
  • When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
    "
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
  • GitHub Check: Redirect rules - docs-optimism
  • GitHub Check: Header rules - docs-optimism
  • GitHub Check: Pages changed - docs-optimism
  • GitHub Check: pr-workflow

@zainbacchus zainbacchus merged commit 283e310 into main Jan 23, 2025
4 of 8 checks passed
@zainbacchus zainbacchus deleted the zainbacchus-patch-4 branch January 23, 2025 23:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants