Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

split deployment manifests #11

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Feb 12, 2024

Conversation

sauterp
Copy link
Member

@sauterp sauterp commented Feb 8, 2024

Description

We split the deployment manifests and make them referencable through kustomize. This simplifies the deployment for users as they don't necessarily need to clone the repo.

Checklist

(For exoscale contributors)

  • Changelog updated (under Unreleased block)
  • Integration tests OK

Testing

kubectl apply -k 'github.com/exoscale/exoscale-csi-driver/deployment?ref=philippsauter/sc-82377/split-deployment-manifests'
storageclass.storage.k8s.io/exoscale-sbs created
Warning: resource customresourcedefinitions/volumesnapshotclasses.snapshot.storage.k8s.io is missing the kubectl.kubernetes.io/last-applied-configuration annotation which is required by kubectl apply. kubectl apply should only be used on resources created declaratively by either kubectl create --save-config or kubectl apply. The missing annotation will be patched automatically.
customresourcedefinition.apiextensions.k8s.io/volumesnapshotclasses.snapshot.storage.k8s.io configured
Warning: resource customresourcedefinitions/volumesnapshotcontents.snapshot.storage.k8s.io is missing the kubectl.kubernetes.io/last-applied-configuration annotation which is required by kubectl apply. kubectl apply should only be used on resources created declaratively by either kubectl create --save-config or kubectl apply. The missing annotation will be patched automatically.
customresourcedefinition.apiextensions.k8s.io/volumesnapshotcontents.snapshot.storage.k8s.io configured
Warning: resource customresourcedefinitions/volumesnapshots.snapshot.storage.k8s.io is missing the kubectl.kubernetes.io/last-applied-configuration annotation which is required by kubectl apply. kubectl apply should only be used on resources created declaratively by either kubectl create --save-config or kubectl apply. The missing annotation will be patched automatically.
customresourcedefinition.apiextensions.k8s.io/volumesnapshots.snapshot.storage.k8s.io configured
serviceaccount/exoscale-csi-controller created
serviceaccount/exoscale-csi-node created
clusterrole.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/exoscale-csi-node-driver created
clusterrole.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/exoscale-csi-attacher created
clusterrole.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/exoscale-csi-provisioner created
clusterrole.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/exoscale-csi-snapshotter created
clusterrole.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/external-resizer created
clusterrolebinding.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/csi-resizer-role created
clusterrolebinding.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/exoscale-csi-attacher created
clusterrolebinding.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/exoscale-csi-controller created
clusterrolebinding.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/exoscale-csi-node-driver created
clusterrolebinding.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/exoscale-csi-snapshotter created
deployment.apps/exoscale-csi-controller created
daemonset.apps/exoscale-csi-node created
volumesnapshotclass.snapshot.storage.k8s.io/exoscale-snapshot created
csidriver.storage.k8s.io/csi.exoscale.com created

Copy link

This pull request has been linked to Shortcut Story #82377: CSI: installation procedure for SKS.

@sauterp sauterp changed the title Philippsauter/sc 82377/split deployment manifests split deployment manifests Feb 8, 2024
@sauterp sauterp marked this pull request as ready for review February 8, 2024 17:30
@sauterp sauterp merged commit d7090e0 into main Feb 12, 2024
@sauterp sauterp deleted the philippsauter/sc-82377/split-deployment-manifests branch February 12, 2024 10:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants