Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

db-migrate: rename knex-specific functions #1372

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

alxndrsn
Copy link
Contributor

@alxndrsn alxndrsn commented Jan 16, 2025

Renames withDatabase() and connect() functions in the database migrator to make it clearer they are directly using knex.

In line with #1364, this renaming will:

  • make intention/use of these functions clearer
  • ease finding of knex-related code across the repo
  • aid deprecating and finally removing knex dependency

What has been done to verify that this works as intended?

CI

Why is this the best possible solution? Were any other approaches considered?

Not really?

How does this change affect users? Describe intentional changes to behavior and behavior that could have accidentally been affected by code changes. In other words, what are the regression risks?

Should not impact users - it's just variable/export renaming.

Does this change require updates to the API documentation? If so, please update docs/api.yaml as part of this PR.

No.

Before submitting this PR, please make sure you have:

  • run make test and confirmed all checks still pass OR confirm CircleCI build passes
  • verified that any code from external sources are properly credited in comments or that everything is internally sourced

Renames `withDatabase()` and `connect()` functions in the database migrator to make it clearer they are directly using knex.

In line with getodk#1364, this renaming will:

* make intention/use of these functions clearer
* ease finding of knex-related code across the repo
* aid deprecating and finally removing knex dependency
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants