Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ci] Dont tar the hail wheel in CI pipelines #13912

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 27, 2023

Conversation

daniel-goldstein
Copy link
Contributor

IIUC the reason we tar the hail wheel to move it between jobs in the CI pipeline is because the wheel name must contain the pip version and that is not known statically in build.yaml. However, it would be just as effective to copy the wheel around inside a directory, and then we don't have to do all this tar'ing and untar'ing.

cc @ehigham I'm happy to hold off on this if it would bork your branch

Copy link
Contributor

@danking danking left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure. Trades the conceptual overhead of a tar file for a Class A Operation (to list the directory), but that seems fine.

@danking
Copy link
Contributor

danking commented Oct 26, 2023

WIP until I sort the release.

@danking danking merged commit 1c53068 into hail-is:main Oct 27, 2023
5 checks passed
jmarshall added a commit to populationgenomics/hail that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2023
Upstream's hail-is#13912 changed this to copy a .whl file in a
subdirectory around, instead of tarring/untarring it for no real reason.
cassimons pushed a commit to populationgenomics/hail that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2023
Upstream's hail-is#13912 changed this to copy a .whl file in a
subdirectory around, instead of tarring/untarring it for no real reason.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants