Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(spec): discussion of consensus getValue() function #760

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Jan 14, 2025

Conversation

cason
Copy link
Contributor

@cason cason commented Jan 14, 2025

Part of #761.


PR author checklist

For all contributors

For external contributors

@cason cason added the spec Related to specifications label Jan 14, 2025
@cason cason self-assigned this Jan 14, 2025
@cason cason requested a review from josef-widder as a code owner January 14, 2025 13:40
Copy link
Member

@josef-widder josef-widder left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great. Thanks! I have left two comments...

Comment on lines +509 to +510
> A priori, every process running a consensus height could provide its proposed
> value for that height, but this approach has some disadvantages:
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wonder whether we should add a bullet point on the Starknet usecase, where it is expensive to compute a proposal (if it must contain a ZK proof), and therefore only the scheduled proposers of round 0 should do that to optimize on the normal case.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added a bullet point with this example.

specs/consensus/overview.md Show resolved Hide resolved
@cason cason added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 14, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit 3e977d1 Jan 14, 2025
2 checks passed
@cason cason deleted the cason/367-get-value-spec branch January 14, 2025 19:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
spec Related to specifications
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants