Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(spec): Consensus timeouts and synchrony assumptions #765

Merged
merged 17 commits into from
Jan 15, 2025

Conversation

cason
Copy link
Contributor

@cason cason commented Jan 14, 2025

Part of #761.

Rendered section.

Probably it is better to merge this PR after PR #764.

PR author checklist

For all contributors

For external contributors

@cason cason added the spec Related to specifications label Jan 14, 2025
@cason cason self-assigned this Jan 14, 2025
@cason cason requested a review from josef-widder as a code owner January 14, 2025 21:57
Copy link
Member

@josef-widder josef-widder left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good

specs/consensus/overview.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment on lines 730 to 731
> Implementations could cancel scheduled timeouts when the state changes and
> the associated conditions are no longer observed.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess also when the process goes to the next round or if it decides and goes to the next height.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am explicitly citing the guard conditions, that are not detailed but explained in the previous paragraph.

@cason cason added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 15, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit 77c741e Jan 15, 2025
2 checks passed
@cason cason deleted the cason/761-timeouts branch January 15, 2025 19:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
spec Related to specifications
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants