Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(ci): e2e changes #4892

Draft
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

chore(ci): e2e changes #4892

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

thibault-martinez
Copy link
Member

@thibault-martinez thibault-martinez commented Jan 17, 2025

  • Don't trigger it on rust changes in PRs
  • Add manual trigger
  • Don't run it on develop

Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 17, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
rebased-explorer 🛑 Canceled (Inspect) Jan 17, 2025 3:40pm
wallet-dashboard ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jan 17, 2025 3:40pm
2 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
apps-backend ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Jan 17, 2025 3:40pm
apps-ui-kit ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Jan 17, 2025 3:40pm

@iota-ci iota-ci added dev-tools Issues related to the Developer Tools Team sc-platform Issues related to the Smart Contract Platform group. labels Jan 17, 2025
@@ -33,7 +34,7 @@ jobs:
# Run e2e test against localnet built on the develop branch
localnet:
name: Localnet
if: inputs.isExplorer || inputs.isTypescriptSDK || inputs.isWallet || inputs.isRust || github.ref_name == 'develop'
if: inputs.isExplorer || inputs.isTypescriptSDK || inputs.isWallet || github.ref_name == 'develop'
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
if: inputs.isExplorer || inputs.isTypescriptSDK || inputs.isWallet || github.ref_name == 'develop'
if: inputs.isExplorer || inputs.isTypescriptSDK || inputs.isWallet

@DaughterOfMars should we also do this?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Or would it prevent it from running from the nightly workflow?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It would prevent it from running in nightly, yes

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

But does leaving it means it will run on pushes to develop?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess not because it won't be called by the hierarchy?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, exactly.

@thibault-martinez thibault-martinez marked this pull request as draft January 17, 2025 17:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dev-tools Issues related to the Developer Tools Team sc-platform Issues related to the Smart Contract Platform group.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants