-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 114
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make ovs-vswitchd service 'other_config' option configurable #823
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Ivan Kolodiazhnyi <[email protected]>
Thanks for your PR,
To skip the vendors CIs, Maintainers can use one of:
|
2dc7153
to
bc320cd
Compare
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 12559608212Details
💛 - Coveralls |
@@ -119,6 +119,9 @@ type System struct { | |||
// +kubebuilder:validation:Enum=shared;exclusive | |||
//RDMA subsystem. Allowed value "shared", "exclusive". | |||
RdmaMode string `json:"rdmaMode,omitempty"` | |||
// OVS config. It will be provided for ovs-vswitchd service as other_config option | |||
// +kubebuilder:default:= "hw-offload=true" | |||
OvsConfig string `json:"ovsConfig,omitempty"` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we use map[string]string here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would like to support all available options, so this syntax will allow us to easly provide options like other-config:mtu!=1500
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would like to support all available options, so this syntax will allow us to easly provide options like other-config:mtu!=1500
do we have a usecase for that for openvswitch table ?
Signed-off-by: Ivan Kolodiazhnyi <[email protected]>
So, here are my thoughts on this one: we should use same API as we have in in addition we should support clearing any global configurations which were set but are not relevant anymore. the i wonder if we want a design doc for this one WDYT ? |
No description provided.