Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

support service selector #79

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 26, 2023
Merged

support service selector #79

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 26, 2023

Conversation

Daniel-GrunbergerCA
Copy link
Collaborator

@Daniel-GrunbergerCA Daniel-GrunbergerCA commented Oct 25, 2023

PR Type:

Enhancement


PR Description:

This PR introduces a new method to retrieve the selector from Service kind objects. The previous GetSelector function was not compatible with Service kind as the selector has a different type. The new method GetServiceSelector returns a map of strings, allowing it to work with the Service kind.


PR Main Files Walkthrough:

files:

workloadinterface/interface.go: Added a new method GetServiceSelector to the IBasicWorkload interface.
workloadinterface/workloadmethods.go: Implemented the GetServiceSelector method in the Workload struct. This method inspects the workload and retrieves the service selector if it exists.
workloadinterface/workloadmethods_test.go: Added a new test TestGetServiceSelector to verify the correct functionality of the GetServiceSelector method.
workloadinterface/workloadmock.go: Added the GetServiceSelector method to the WorkloadMock struct to align with the updated interface.


User Description:

Current GetSelector function doesn't work for Service kind, since the selector has a different type. This PR adds support for retrieving selectors from services as well

Signed-off-by: Daniel Grunberger <[email protected]>
@codiumai-pr-agent-free codiumai-pr-agent-free bot added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 25, 2023
@codiumai-pr-agent-free
Copy link

PR Analysis

  • 🎯 Main theme: Adding support for service selector in the workload interface
  • 📝 PR summary: This PR introduces a new method to retrieve the selector from Service kind objects. The previous GetSelector function was not compatible with Service kind as the selector has a different type. The new method GetServiceSelector returns a map of strings, allowing it to work with the Service kind.
  • 📌 Type of PR: Enhancement
  • 🧪 Relevant tests added: Yes
  • ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]: 2, because the PR is relatively small and introduces a new method with its corresponding test. The changes are straightforward and don't seem to introduce complex logic.
  • 🔒 Security concerns: No security concerns found

PR Feedback

  • 💡 General suggestions: The PR is well-structured and the changes are clear. The new method is implemented consistently across the interface, its implementation, and the mock. The test case seems to cover the basic functionality of the new method. However, it would be beneficial to consider edge cases and error handling in the new method.

  • 🤖 Code feedback:

    • relevant file: workloadinterface/workloadmethods.go
      suggestion: Consider adding error handling in the GetServiceSelector method. If the type assertion fails, the method will panic. It would be better to handle this error gracefully and return an appropriate error message. [important]
      relevant line: '+ for k, i := range v.(map[string]interface{}) {'

How to use

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:
/review [-i]: Request a review of your Pull Request. For an incremental review, which only considers changes since the last review, include the '-i' option.
/describe: Modify the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
/improve [--extended]: Suggest improvements to the code in the PR. Extended mode employs several calls, and provides a more thorough feedback.
/ask <QUESTION>: Pose a question about the PR.
/update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.

To edit any configuration parameter from configuration.toml, add --config_path=new_value
For example: /review --pr_reviewer.extra_instructions="focus on the file: ..."
To list the possible configuration parameters, use the /config command.

@github-actions
Copy link

Summary:

  • License scan: failure
  • Credentials scan: success
  • Vulnerabilities scan: failure
  • Unit test: success
  • Go linting: success

1 similar comment
@github-actions
Copy link

Summary:

  • License scan: failure
  • Credentials scan: success
  • Vulnerabilities scan: failure
  • Unit test: success
  • Go linting: success

@Daniel-GrunbergerCA Daniel-GrunbergerCA merged commit b98c261 into main Oct 26, 2023
9 checks passed
@Daniel-GrunbergerCA Daniel-GrunbergerCA deleted the svc-selector branch October 26, 2023 10:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants