Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support initContainers #90

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 24, 2024
Merged

Support initContainers #90

merged 3 commits into from
Jan 24, 2024

Conversation

dwertent
Copy link
Collaborator

@dwertent dwertent commented Jan 17, 2024

Type

Tests, Enhancement


Description

This PR introduces tests and enhancements for the initcontainerinstance package in the instanceidhandler module. The main changes include:

  • Addition of instanceidhandler_test.go and helpers_test.go in the initcontainerinstance package. These files contain tests for generating and validating instance IDs for Kubernetes workloads, and for helper functions respectively.
  • Modification of initializers_test.go in the instanceidhandler module to use a deployment workload for testing instead of a pod.
  • Modification of helpers_test.go in the containerinstance package to update the package import path.

Changes walkthrough

Relevant files                                                                                                                                 
Tests
instanceidhandler_test.go                                                                     
    instanceidhandler/v1/initcontainerinstance/instanceidhandler_test.go

    This file was added in the PR. It contains tests for the
    initcontainerinstance package, specifically for generating
    and validating instance IDs for Kubernetes workloads. The
    tests cover various scenarios including different types of
    workloads (e.g., Pod, ReplicaSet) and different conditions
    (e.g., valid and invalid instance IDs).

+216/-0
helpers_test.go                                                                                         
    instanceidhandler/v1/initcontainerinstance/helpers_test.go

    This file was added in the PR. It contains tests for helper
    functions in the initcontainerinstance package. The tests
    cover various scenarios including validating instance IDs
    and listing instance IDs.

+328/-0
initializers_test.go                                                                               
    instanceidhandler/v1/initializers_test.go

    This file was modified in the PR. The changes include
    updating the package import path and modifying the
    TestInitInstanceID function to use a deployment workload
    for testing instead of a pod.

+14/-112
Miscellaneous
helpers_test.go                                                                                         
    instanceidhandler/v1/containerinstance/helpers_test.go

    This file was modified in the PR. The changes include
    updating the package import path.

+1/-76

✨ Usage guide:

Overview:
The describe tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a description for the PR - title, type, summary, walkthrough and labels. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on a PR.

When commenting, to edit configurations related to the describe tool (pr_description section), use the following template:

/describe --pr_description.some_config1=... --pr_description.some_config2=...

With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_description]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...
Enabling\disabling automation
  • When you first install the app, the default mode for the describe tool is:
pr_commands = ["/describe --pr_description.add_original_user_description=true" 
                         "--pr_description.keep_original_user_title=true", ...]

meaning the describe tool will run automatically on every PR, will keep the original title, and will add the original user description above the generated description.

  • Markers are an alternative way to control the generated description, to give maximal control to the user. If you set:
pr_commands = ["/describe --pr_description.use_description_markers=true", ...]

the tool will replace every marker of the form pr_agent:marker_name in the PR description with the relevant content, where marker_name is one of the following:

  • type: the PR type.
  • summary: the PR summary.
  • walkthrough: the PR walkthrough.

Note that when markers are enabled, if the original PR description does not contain any markers, the tool will not alter the description at all.

Custom labels

The default labels of the describe tool are quite generic: [Bug fix, Tests, Enhancement, Documentation, Other].

If you specify custom labels in the repo's labels page or via configuration file, you can get tailored labels for your use cases.
Examples for custom labels:

  • Main topic:performance - pr_agent:The main topic of this PR is performance
  • New endpoint - pr_agent:A new endpoint was added in this PR
  • SQL query - pr_agent:A new SQL query was added in this PR
  • Dockerfile changes - pr_agent:The PR contains changes in the Dockerfile
  • ...

The list above is eclectic, and aims to give an idea of different possibilities. Define custom labels that are relevant for your repo and use cases.
Note that Labels are not mutually exclusive, so you can add multiple label categories.
Make sure to provide proper title, and a detailed and well-phrased description for each label, so the tool will know when to suggest it.

Utilizing extra instructions

The describe tool can be configured with extra instructions, to guide the model to a feedback tailored to the needs of your project.

Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Notice that the general structure of the description is fixed, and cannot be changed. Extra instructions can change the content or style of each sub-section of the PR description.

Examples for extra instructions:

[pr_description] 
extra_instructions="""
- The PR title should be in the format: '<PR type>: <title>'
- The title should be short and concise (up to 10 words)
- ...
"""

Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

More PR-Agent commands

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:

  • /review: Request a review of your Pull Request.
  • /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
  • /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback.
  • /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR.
  • /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.
  • /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR.
  • /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents.
  • /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component.

See the tools guide for more details.
To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

See the describe usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.

Signed-off-by: David Wertenteil <[email protected]>
@codiumai-pr-agent-free codiumai-pr-agent-free bot added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 17, 2024
Copy link

PR Description updated to latest commit (6145fd2)

Copy link

PR Analysis

  • 🎯 Main theme: Adding tests and enhancements for the initcontainerinstance package in the instanceidhandler module
  • 📝 PR summary: This PR introduces tests and enhancements for the initcontainerinstance package in the instanceidhandler module. It includes the addition of instanceidhandler_test.go and helpers_test.go in the initcontainerinstance package, modification of initializers_test.go in the instanceidhandler module, and modification of helpers_test.go in the containerinstance package.
  • 📌 Type of PR: Tests
    Enhancement
  • 🧪 Relevant tests added: Yes
  • ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]: 4, because the PR includes a significant amount of new code, including tests and enhancements, which requires a detailed review to ensure the correctness and efficiency of the code.
  • 🔒 Security concerns: No security concerns found

PR Feedback

💡 General suggestions: The PR is generally well-structured, and the code is clean and easy to read. It's great to see that tests are included for the new functionality. However, it would be beneficial to include more comments in the code to explain what each function does and how it works. This would make the code easier to understand and maintain in the future.

🤖 Code feedback:
relevant fileinstanceidhandler/v1/initcontainerinstance/instanceidhandler_test.go
suggestion      

Consider using table-driven tests for the TestInstanceID function. This would make the tests more readable and maintainable. [important]

relevant linefunc TestInstanceID(t *testing.T) {

relevant fileinstanceidhandler/v1/initcontainerinstance/instanceidhandler_test.go
suggestion      

It would be beneficial to use more descriptive error messages in the checkAllsFunctions function. This would make it easier to understand what went wrong if a test fails. [medium]

relevant linefunc checkAllsFunctions(object string, apiversion, namespace, kind, name, containerName, formattedString, expectedHash string, expectedLabels map[string]string) error {

relevant fileinstanceidhandler/v1/initcontainerinstance/helpers_test.go
suggestion      

Consider using constants for repeated string values in the Test_validateInstanceID function. This would make the code more maintainable and less prone to typos. [medium]

relevant linefunc Test_validateInstanceID(t *testing.T) {

relevant fileinstanceidhandler/v1/initcontainerinstance/helpers_test.go
suggestion      

It would be beneficial to use more descriptive test names in the Test_listInstanceIDs function. This would make it easier to understand what each test is checking. [medium]

relevant linefunc Test_listInstanceIDs(t *testing.T) {


✨ Usage guide:

Overview:
The review tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a PR review. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR.
When commenting, to edit configurations related to the review tool (pr_reviewer section), use the following template:

/review --pr_reviewer.some_config1=... --pr_reviewer.some_config2=...

With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_reviewer]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...
Utilizing extra instructions

The review tool can be configured with extra instructions, which can be used to guide the model to a feedback tailored to the needs of your project.

Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify the relevant sub-tool, and the relevant aspects of the PR that you want to emphasize.

Examples for extra instructions:

[pr_reviewer] # /review #
extra_instructions="""
In the code feedback section, emphasize the following:
- Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases?
- Is the code logic clear and easy to understand?
- Is the code logic efficient?
...
"""

Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

How to enable\disable automation
  • When you first install PR-Agent app, the default mode for the review tool is:
pr_commands = ["/review", ...]

meaning the review tool will run automatically on every PR, with the default configuration.
Edit this field to enable/disable the tool, or to change the used configurations

About the 'Code feedback' section

The review tool provides several type of feedbacks, one of them is code suggestions.
If you are interested only in the code suggestions, it is recommended to use the improve feature instead, since it dedicated only to code suggestions, and usually gives better results.
Use the review tool if you want to get a more comprehensive feedback, which includes code suggestions as well.

Auto-labels

The review tool can auto-generate two specific types of labels for a PR:

  • a possible security issue label, that detects possible security issues (enable_review_labels_security flag)
  • a Review effort [1-5]: x label, where x is the estimated effort to review the PR (enable_review_labels_effort flag)
Extra sub-tools

The review tool provides a collection of possible feedbacks about a PR.
It is recommended to review the possible options, and choose the ones relevant for your use case.
Some of the feature that are disabled by default are quite useful, and should be considered for enabling. For example:
require_score_review, require_soc2_review, enable_review_labels_effort, and more.

More PR-Agent commands

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:

  • /review: Request a review of your Pull Request.
  • /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
  • /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback.
  • /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR.
  • /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.
  • /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR.
  • /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents.
  • /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component.

See the tools guide for more details.
To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

See the review usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.

Copy link

Summary:

  • License scan: failure
  • Credentials scan: success
  • Vulnerabilities scan: failure
  • Unit test: success
  • Go linting: success

1 similar comment
Copy link

Summary:

  • License scan: failure
  • Credentials scan: success
  • Vulnerabilities scan: failure
  • Unit test: success
  • Go linting: success

Signed-off-by: David Wertenteil <[email protected]>
Copy link

Summary:

  • License scan: failure
  • Credentials scan: success
  • Vulnerabilities scan: failure
  • Unit test: success
  • Go linting: success

Signed-off-by: David Wertenteil <[email protected]>
Copy link

Summary:

  • License scan: failure
  • Credentials scan: success
  • Vulnerabilities scan: failure
  • Unit test: success
  • Go linting: success

@dwertent dwertent merged commit a0ceab8 into main Jan 24, 2024
6 of 7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request Tests
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant