-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 148
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: use monorepo queries #5343
Conversation
Important Review SkippedMore than 25% of the files skipped due to max files limit. The review is being skipped to prevent a low-quality review. 64 files out of 121 files are above the max files limit of 50. Please upgrade to Pro plan to get higher limits. You can disable this status message by setting the Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
This one is ready for review. Fix for failing tests is out for review in monorepo. Once that's merged I'll update the packages and it should fix the failing CI. Other than that, codewise this PR is ready |
7a3a71c
to
a2b839a
Compare
Sorry, I prob just really created a lot of conflicts for you with my last merge. If helps, I can rebase this for you? |
@fbwoolf nope all good! Merged, thank you! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fantastic refactor work @edgarkhanzadian 👏🏼
tests/mocks/mock-inscriptions.ts
Outdated
@@ -1,8 +1,9 @@ | |||
import { Inscription } from '@shared/models/inscription.model'; | |||
// import { createInscription } from '@leather-wallet/models'; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can these commented out lines be removed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🚀
org: GITHUB_ORG, | ||
repo: GITHUB_REPO, | ||
branchName: BRANCH_NAME, | ||
localConfig: localConfig as any, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We don't need to make this change now, but think the remote config should be separate
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You mean like a separate package or it should be extension specific?
0735c8e
to
b5d0805
Compare
cda6bee
to
832434e
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great work 🚀
Connected to this PR in monorepo: leather-io/mono#113