Ecse 1412 - just re-arrainging the schema, broke some CMR tests that were fixed.

[eereiter]

No description provided.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #1980 (854611e) into master (e1219ab) will decrease coverage by 0.02%.
Report is 4 commits behind head on master.
The diff coverage is 92.30%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1980      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   55.21%   55.20%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         990      990              
  Lines       62909    62927      +18     
  Branches     1547     1551       +4     
==========================================
+ Hits        34736    34739       +3     
- Misses      26628    26637       +9     
- Partials     1545     1551       +6     

Files	Coverage Δ
...cmr/umm_spec/test/iso19115_expected_conversion.clj	97.69% <100.00%> (+1.06%)	⬆️
...-spec-lib/src/cmr/umm_spec/test/umm_generators.clj	86.31% <100.00%> (ø)
...mm_spec/umm_to_xml_mappings/iso19115_2/spatial.clj	99.43% <100.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
...mm_mappings/iso_shared/shared_iso_parsing_util.clj	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...cmr/umm_spec/xml_to_umm_mappings/dif10/spatial.clj	96.92% <91.42%> (-2.28%)	⬇️
...mr/umm_spec/xml_to_umm_mappings/echo10/spatial.clj	95.87% <85.71%> (-4.13%)	⬇️
...mm_spec/xml_to_umm_mappings/iso19115_2/spatial.clj	95.84% <89.65%> (-1.04%)	⬇️

... and 3 files with indirect coverage changes

[jmaeng72]

I think we are trying to keep the code coverage the same or more than the current percentage. Can you add unit tests to increase your code coverage?

[eereiter]

All I did was fix tests, If I were to add a unit test, it would be for something unrelated.

[jceaser]

functionally this looks great, just suggest some minor changes to variable names if it is acceptable to the author.