-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 48
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
FEAT: from setup to pyproject #161
FEAT: from setup to pyproject #161
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #161 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 85.68% 85.68%
=======================================
Files 11 11
Lines 566 566
Branches 67 67
=======================================
Hits 485 485
Misses 45 45
Partials 36 36 |
@ofek I stumbled upon a lot of discussions about build systems, maybe at some point we should use |
Specifically, the new one https://github.com/scikit-build/scikit-build-core |
Let's try to transition more metadate from setup to pyproject, this way when we hatch, it'll be simpler and both setuptools and hatchling may be tested in quasi-parallel