-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Public consultation meetings: recording details of public consultation meetings during preparation stage #409
Comments
OC(4I)DS typically uses the construction numberOfParticipants, not participantCount. consultationMeetingInvite -> consultationMeetingInvitation |
I suggest the following updates to field descriptions so that the
We should also align the description of 'consultationMeetingMinutes' with the description of 'lobbyingMeetingMinutes' (can just replace 'lobbying' with 'public consultation'):
|
Thanks both, I've updated the table and example as per your suggestions |
@EvelynDinora @mgraca-prado do either of you have an objection to using the existing "minutes" documentType code instead of creating a specific "consultationMeetingMinutes" code for this issue? |
I've updated the proposal in the issue description to reflect the suggestion in #412 (comment) (changed 'consultationMeetingMinutes' to 'minutes.consultationMeeting'). |
@duncandewhurst , Agreed with the proposed change to minutes.consultationMeeting |
Noting typo (constulationMeetings). |
Typo corrected! |
sounds like this is now agreed so I'm moving it into the Agreed column |
|
Background
This issue relates to the following CoST IDS elements proposed in the CoST IDS/OC4IDS review:
Public consultation meetings
Public consultation meetings
Module: Social
Indicator: Public participation
Disclosure format
OC4IDS mapping
.documentType
to ‘consultationMeetingInvitation’ and its.url
to the URL at which the meeting invite is available.Meeting
object to the.social.consultationMeetings
array and set:.id
incrementally -.date
to the date of the meeting.address
to the address of the meeting.numberOfParticipants
to the number of people that participated in the meeting..documentType
to ‘consultationMeetingMinutes’ and its.url
to the URL at which the meeting minutes are available.Proposal
Create a
Meeting
object to be used in thesocial.consultationMeetings
array to hold details of public meetings. This object will contain anid
, adescription
alocation
object and anumberOfParticipants
. Also add 2 new codes to documentType codelist to allow reference to consultationMeetingInvitation and consultationMeetingMinutes. See #403 for the overarchingSocial
object.Add the following fields and objects:
Meeting
objectsLocation
objectAdd the following codes:
Example
Discussion
Qu - Are there any use cases that depend on comparing this level of detail across projects? Or would it be enough to just require that the publishers provide documents with these details?
Ans - Seeing patterns of meetings is useful. "How many projects did a consultation process” “Is there a difference in consultation based on funding” Publish the invite first, then what took place (agenda, minutes, location). Use case is being able to see if particular types of projects or particular publishers are having or not having these meetings and which communities are actually engaging in them. Possibly don’t need full details as data but good to have more than just documents for each meeting. Also important to have the options.
document.description
can make it clear what the type of meeting being minuted was.cc @EvelynDinora
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: