Use path for mdoc

[danielfett]

No description provided.

[paulbastian]

Why is this section here and not in the mdoc credential format appendix? It's explicitly for ISO mdoc, so I don't understand why it should be here.

[Sakurann]

i think for the symmetry with JSON-based credentials section. will merge as-is since there are enough approvals and no other blockers. we can fix this later if necessary, as we did with the mdoc section in the very first DCQL PR.

[babisRoutis]

A question from my side: In the mdoc case, is it valid to have a path with a single element (the namespace)?

If not, should somehow this constraint appear on the spec in the mdoc section?

[Sakurann]

A question from my side: In the mdoc case, is it valid to have a path with a single element (the namespace)?

If not, should somehow this constraint appear on the spec in the mdoc section?

my understanding is that path for mdoc always has at least 2 elements, so we should make that clear

[babisRoutis]

A question from my side: In the mdoc case, is it valid to have a path with a single element (the namespace)?
If not, should somehow this constraint appear on the spec in the mdoc section?

my understanding is that path for mdoc always has at least 2 elements, so we should make that clear

It seems that I hadn't read carefully the PR.
Indeed, PR contains a constraint for mdoc path that suggests that it should have exactly two elements.