Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Backend Samples: place on worker nodes #333

Merged

Conversation

Akrog
Copy link
Contributor

@Akrog Akrog commented Feb 12, 2024

The current samples are deploying MachineConfigs on master nodes, which works just fine because right now all our master nodes are also worker nodes, but is not technically correct.

This patch updates the MachineConfigs to deploy on worker nodes, which is the technically correct location.

The current samples are deploying MachineConfigs on master nodes, which
works just fine because right now all our master nodes are also worker
nodes, but is not technically correct.

This patch updates the MachineConfigs to deploy on worker nodes, which
is the technically correct location.
Copy link
Contributor

@ASBishop ASBishop left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@@ -2,10 +2,10 @@ apiVersion: machineconfiguration.openshift.io/v1
kind: MachineConfig
metadata:
labels:
machineconfiguration.openshift.io/role: master
machineconfiguration.openshift.io/role: worker
service: cinder
component: cinder-volume
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Independent of this PR (which looks fine), we'll need to ensure this machineConfig is applied to only one worker, and the associated c-vol service is constrained to that worker.

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 12, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Akrog, ASBishop

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 60a9aba into openstack-k8s-operators:main Feb 12, 2024
7 checks passed
ASBishop pushed a commit to ASBishop/cinder-operator that referenced this pull request Mar 11, 2024
…rators/renovate/openstack-k8s-operators

Update openstack-k8s-operators
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants