feat: carma outlier detection method

[d0choa]

CARMA outlier detection method:

• Migration of the method from @addramir repo
• Documentation page
• Testing

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: 29 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (42b366c) 85.67% compared to head (20d4510) 86.84%.
Report is 35 commits behind head on dev.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev     #281      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   85.67%   86.84%   +1.17%     
==========================================
  Files          89       92       +3     
  Lines        2101     2433     +332     
==========================================
+ Hits         1800     2113     +313     
- Misses        301      320      +19     

Files	Coverage Δ
src/airflow/dags/common_airflow.py	90.38% <ø> (ø)
src/airflow/dags/finngen_preprocess.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/otg/dataset/l2g_feature_matrix.py	82.92% <ø> (+7.31%)	⬆️
src/otg/dataset/study_locus.py	96.20% <100.00%> (+0.04%)	⬆️
src/otg/datasource/eqtl_catalogue/study_index.py	85.00% <ø> (ø)
src/otg/datasource/finngen/study_index.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/otg/datasource/finngen/summary_stats.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/otg/datasource/gwas_catalog/study_index.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/otg/datasource/ukbiobank/study_index.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/otg/l2g.py	58.06% <ø> (ø)
... and 8 more

[d0choa]

You can easily get 100% testing coverage by adding additional examples that evaluate the conditions (if statements) that you are currently missing.

Have a look at the red lines here:
https://app.codecov.io/gh/opentargets/genetics_etl_python/pull/281/blob/src/otg/method/carma.py

[addramir]

@d0choa I can add two more tests to cover red lines 288-296. But not for others - specific extreme cases that very hard to reach since they are using intermediate output of the functions.

[addramir]

@d0choa I have added two tests. For now this is the biggest coverage I can get.

[d0choa]

@DSuveges we need approval here

[tskir]

I added some minor style comments, but overall everything looks good to me

[addramir]

@DSuveges could you please help to resolve the conflict in poetry.lock?