Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ros_gz: 2.1.3-2 in 'rolling/distribution.yaml' [bloom] #44184

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 14, 2025

Conversation

ahcorde
Copy link
Contributor

@ahcorde ahcorde commented Jan 14, 2025

Increasing version of package(s) in repository ros_gz to 2.1.3-2:

ros_gz

  • No changes

ros_gz_bridge

* Use both ROS package and message name for unique mappings (#656 <https://github.com/gazebosim/ros_gz/issues/656>)
  Co-authored-by: Addisu Z. Taddese <mailto:[email protected]>
* Merge pull request #664 <https://github.com/gazebosim/ros_gz/issues/664> from azeey/improve_parameter_handling
  Co-authored-by: Alejandro Hernández Cordero <mailto:[email protected]>
* Merge pull request #663 <https://github.com/gazebosim/ros_gz/issues/663> from azeey/improve_arg_parsing
  The RosGzBridge and GzServer now support different spellings for
  boolean arguments (True, true). This also simplifies how
  conditionals are used to create composable nodes by evaluating the
  conditionals and using them as regular Python booleans instead of
  relying on PythonExpression. It was actually the PythonExpression
  that was preventing support of boolean arguments spelled true/false.
* Improve parameter handling for RosGzBridge
* Fix linter errors
* Improve argument parsing in Actions
  The RosGzBridge and GzServer now support different spellings for
  boolean arguments (True, true). This also simplifies how
  conditionals are used to create composable nodes by evaluating the
  conditionals and using them as regular Python booleans instead of
  relying on PythonExpression. It was actually the PythonExpression
  that was preventing support of boolean arguments spelled true/false.
* Fix use_respawn argument causing errors (#651 <https://github.com/gazebosim/ros_gz/issues/651>)
* Add a way to pass extra parameters to ros_gz_bridge (#628 <https://github.com/gazebosim/ros_gz/issues/628>)
  * Add bridge_params argument to ros_gz_bridge
  Co-authored-by: Alejandro Hernández Cordero <mailto:[email protected]>
  Co-authored-by: Wiktor Bajor <mailto:[email protected]>
* Contributors: Aarav Gupta, Addisu Z. Taddese, Alejandro Hernández Cordero, Øystein Sture

ros_gz_image

  • No changes

ros_gz_interfaces

  • No changes

ros_gz_sim

* Shutdown explicitly while existing (#623 <https://github.com/gazebosim/ros_gz/issues/623>)
* Merge pull request #663 <https://github.com/gazebosim/ros_gz/issues/663> from azeey/improve_arg_parsing
  The RosGzBridge and GzServer now support different spellings for
  boolean arguments (True, true). This also simplifies how
  conditionals are used to create composable nodes by evaluating the
  conditionals and using them as regular Python booleans instead of
  relying on PythonExpression. It was actually the PythonExpression
  that was preventing support of boolean arguments spelled true/false.
* Fix linter errors
* Improve argument parsing in Actions
  The RosGzBridge and GzServer now support different spellings for
  boolean arguments (True, true). This also simplifies how
  conditionals are used to create composable nodes by evaluating the
  conditionals and using them as regular Python booleans instead of
  relying on PythonExpression. It was actually the PythonExpression
  that was preventing support of boolean arguments spelled true/false.
* Set env path (#659 <https://github.com/gazebosim/ros_gz/issues/659>)
* Use member variables instead. (#653 <https://github.com/gazebosim/ros_gz/issues/653>)
* Move gzserver logic to its action (#646 <https://github.com/gazebosim/ros_gz/issues/646>)
* Add a way to pass extra parameters to ros_gz_bridge (#628 <https://github.com/gazebosim/ros_gz/issues/628>)
  * Add bridge_params argument to ros_gz_bridge
  Co-authored-by: Alejandro Hernández Cordero <mailto:[email protected]>
  Co-authored-by: Wiktor Bajor <mailto:[email protected]>
* Add remove entity node (#629 <https://github.com/gazebosim/ros_gz/issues/629>)
* Contributors: Aarav Gupta, Addisu Z. Taddese, Alejandro Hernández Cordero, Carlos Agüero, ChenYing Kuo (CY), Tatsuro Sakaguchi, Wiktor Bajor

ros_gz_sim_demos

* Refactor triggered_camera demo (#645 <https://github.com/gazebosim/ros_gz/issues/645>)
  Co-authored-by: Alejandro Hernández Cordero <mailto:[email protected]>
* Refactor rgbd_camera_bridge demo (#643 <https://github.com/gazebosim/ros_gz/issues/643>)
  Co-authored-by: Alejandro Hernández Cordero <mailto:[email protected]>
* Refactor diff_drive demo (#635 <https://github.com/gazebosim/ros_gz/issues/635>)
  Co-authored-by: Alejandro Hernández Cordero <mailto:[email protected]>
* Refactor gpu_lidar_bridge demo (#636 <https://github.com/gazebosim/ros_gz/issues/636>)
  * Refactor gpu_lidar_bridge demo
* Refactor camera demo (#634 <https://github.com/gazebosim/ros_gz/issues/634>)
  Co-authored-by: Alejandro Hernández Cordero <mailto:[email protected]>
* Refactor battery demo (#633 <https://github.com/gazebosim/ros_gz/issues/633>)
* Refactor tf_bridge demo (#644 <https://github.com/gazebosim/ros_gz/issues/644>)
* Refactor magnetometer demo (#638 <https://github.com/gazebosim/ros_gz/issues/638>)
* Refactor imu demo (#637 <https://github.com/gazebosim/ros_gz/issues/637>)
  * Refactor imu demo
* Refactor navsat_gpxfix demo (#642 <https://github.com/gazebosim/ros_gz/issues/642>)
  * Refactor navsat_gpxfix demo
* Refactor navsat demo (#639 <https://github.com/gazebosim/ros_gz/issues/639>)
  * Refactor navsat demo
* Refactor air pressure demo (#632 <https://github.com/gazebosim/ros_gz/issues/632>)
  * Refactor air pressure demo
  Co-authored-by: Addisu Z. Taddese <mailto:[email protected]>
  Co-authored-by: Alejandro Hernández Cordero <mailto:[email protected]>
* Contributors: Carlos Agüero

test_ros_gz_bridge

  • No changes

@github-actions github-actions bot added the rolling Issue/PR is for the ROS 2 Rolling distribution label Jan 14, 2025
Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for sending a pull request to ROS distro!

This is an automated tool that helps check your pull request for correctness.
This tool checks a number of attributes associated with your ROS package and generates a report that helps our reviewers merge your pull request in a timely fashion. Here are a few things to consider when sending adding or updating a package to ROS Distro.
ROS Distro includes a very helpful CONTRIBUTING.md file that we recommend reading if it is your first time submitting a package.
Please also read the ROS Distro review guidelines which summarizes this release process.

ROS Distro Considerations

Package Considerations

Having your package included in a ROS Distro is a badge of quality, and we recommend that package developers strive to create packages of the highest quality. We recommend package developers review the following resources before submitting their package.

Need Help?

Please post your questions to Robotics Stack Exchange or refer to the #infra-help channel on our Discord server.


For changes related to yamllint:

  • ✅ All new lines of YAML pass linter checks

@christophebedard christophebedard merged commit 446a172 into ros:master Jan 14, 2025
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
rolling Issue/PR is for the ROS 2 Rolling distribution
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants