Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add TypeSyntax util functions #2886
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Add TypeSyntax util functions #2886
Changes from 1 commit
7eeaf2b
96d8330
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please provide documentation comments for all public APIs. Once we settle on them, please add an entry to the release notes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is largely a copy of the
isVoid
implementation above. I'm concerned that this approach to the API doesn't really scale: are we going to end up growingisSwiftUInt
,isSwiftBool
,isSwiftSet
, and others as separate properties? That doesn't seem like a desirable end state.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I found a way to generalise it to types where the canonical name only contains
MemberTypeSyntax
orIdentifierTypeSyntax
. This doesn't includeVoid
since it's a tuple, and there doesn't seem to be a good way to generalise meta types for tuples; I couldn't find anything likeTuple.Type
, so handling tuple types would involve enumerating every arity. Not sure how to handle type shadowing either, since there doesn't seem to be a way to reifymodule<Swift>.self
.