Maven enforcer rule that bans certain imports. Keep your code base clean and free from usage of unwanted classes! More
- Java
- Kotlin (since 0.15)
- Groovy (since 0.15)
- Scala (see Issue 24)
This is a minimal usage example. Please scroll down for detailed configuration information.
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-enforcer-plugin</artifactId>
<version>3.0.0-M2</version>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>de.skuzzle.enforcer</groupId>
<artifactId>restrict-imports-enforcer-rule</artifactId>
<version>1.0.1</version>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>check-logging-imports</id> <!-- put an explanatory ID here -->
<phase>process-sources</phase>
<goals>
<goal>enforce</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<rules>
<restrictImports implementation="de.skuzzle.enforcer.restrictimports.rule.RestrictImports">
<!-- Define an explanatory reason why these imports are prohibited -->
<reason>Use SLF4j for logging</reason>
<!-- Specify a single pattern to be banned -->
<bannedImport>java.util.logging.**</bannedImport>
</restrictImports>
<!-- You could have another rule instance here for restricting further imports -->
</rules>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>Grown code bases often have a huge number of dependencies. That leads to a lot of clutter in their
compile time classpath. My favorite example here is logging frameworks: every java project
of decent size likely has numerous classes named Logger available on the classpath and your
favorite IDE happily lists them all for auto completion. How should someone new to
the project know which Logger to use? You certainly do not want to mix logging frameworks in your
code base.
Another example is to force your developers to only use AssertJ assertions instead of JUnit or TestNG assertions.
Using this enforcer rule gives you fine grained control over which classes are allowed to be used in your application without having to exclude whole artifacts from your classpath.
To refine the classes that are banned you may use the allowedImports tag in addition to
the bannedImports tag. For example you can exclude a whole sub package using a wildcard
operator and then include some concrete classes:
<configuration>
<rules>
<restrictImports implementation="de.skuzzle.enforcer.restrictimports.rule.RestrictImports">
<bannedImport>java.util.logging.**</bannedImport>
<allowedImport>java.util.logging.Handler</allowedImport>
</restrictImports>
</rules>
</configuration>It is possible to exclude certain source files from being affected by the bans at
all. You can use basePackage to specify a package pattern of classes that are affected
by the rule. You may then exclude some classes to refine the matches using the
excludedClasses tag. It is also possible to specify multiple base packages.
<configuration>
<rules>
<restrictImports implementation="de.skuzzle.enforcer.restrictimports.rule.RestrictImports">
<basePackages>
<basePackage>com.your.domain.**</basePackage>
<basePackage>com.your.company.**</basePackage>
</basePackages>
<bannedImport>java.util.logging.**</bannedImport>
<allowedImport>java.util.logging.Handler</allowedImport>
<!-- The following packages will not be checked for banned imports -->
<exclusion>com.your.domain.treat.special.*</exclusion>
</restrictImports>
</rules>
</configuration>Wherever you write package patterns you can also specify a list of patterns. Thus it is possible to define multiple banned imports/exclusions/allowed imports or base packages.
<configuration>
<rules>
<restrictImports implementation="de.skuzzle.enforcer.restrictimports.rule.RestrictImports">
<bannedImports>
<bannedImport>java.util.logging.**</bannedImport>
<bannedImport>what.ever.**</bannedImport>
</bannedImports>
<allowedImports>
<allowedImport>java.util.logging.Handler</allowedImport>
<allowedImport>what.ever.IsCool</allowedImport>
</allowedImports>
<!-- ... -->
</restrictImports>
</rules>
</configuration>(Note: This is a beta feature and not thoroughly tested. Syntax and behavior changes in upcoming versions are likely)
Rule groups add another level of refining which imports will be matched. You can group
the bannedImport(s), allowedImport(s) and basePackage(s) tags and specify multiple
of this groups within a single enforcer rule.
<configuration>
<rules>
<restrictImports implementation="de.skuzzle.enforcer.restrictimports.rule.RestrictImports">
<groups>
<group>
<reason>Persistence classes must only be used from within .persistence package</reason>
<basePackage>**</basePackage>
<bannedImports>
<bannedImport>javax.persistence.EntityManager</bannedImport>
<bannedImport>javax.sql.DataSource</bannedImport>
<bannedImport>javax.persistence.NamedQueries</bannedImport>
<bannedImport>javax.persistence.NamedQuery</bannedImport>
<bannedImport>javax.ejb.Stateful</bannedImport>
<bannedImport>javax.ejb.EJB</bannedImport>
</bannedImports>
</group>
<group>
<basePackage>com.yourdomain.persistence.**</basePackage>
<bannedImports>
<bannedImport>javax.persistence.NamedQueries</bannedImport>
<bannedImport>javax.persistence.NamedQuery</bannedImport>
<bannedImport>javax.ejb.Stateful</bannedImport>
<bannedImport>javax.ejb.EJB</bannedImport>
</bannedImports>
</group>
</groups>
</restrictImports>
</rules>
</configuration>When analysing a source file, the plugin filters all groups where the group's
basePackage matches the source file's package name. In case multiple groups are
matching, only the group with the most specific base package is retained and the others
are ignored for this file. Have a look at this file to have a glance at how specificity works.
Matching static imports is also possible but the static prefix must be explicitly mentioned:
<configuration>
<rules>
<restrictImports implementation="de.skuzzle.enforcer.restrictimports.rule.RestrictImports">
<bannedImport>static org.junit.Assert.*</bannedImport>
</restrictImports>
</rules>
</configuration>Inclusions and exclusion will work identically.
By default, test code is not subject to the banned import checks. You can enable analysis
of test code using the includeTestCode option.
<configuration>
<rules>
<restrictImports implementation="de.skuzzle.enforcer.restrictimports.rule.RestrictImports">
<includeTestCode>true</includeTestCode>
<!-- ... -->
</restrictImports>
</rules>
</configuration>Using the configuration option skip you are able to temporarily disable a rule
instance.
<configuration>
<rules>
<restrictImports implementation="de.skuzzle.enforcer.restrictimports.rule.RestrictImports">
<skip>true</skip>
<!-- ... -->
</restrictImports>
</rules>
</configuration>If you want banned import analysis but without breaking your build you can set
failBuild to false.
<configuration>
<rules>
<restrictImports implementation="de.skuzzle.enforcer.restrictimports.rule.RestrictImports">
<failBuild>false</failBuild>
<!-- ... -->
</restrictImports>
</rules>
</configuration>Package patterns are matched case sensitively part by part. There are two supported wildcard operators:
*matches every package part but exactly one.**matches multiple package parts but at least one.
The pattern java.util.* matches java.util.ArrayList but not java.util.regex.Pattern.
Likewise the pattern java.util.** matches all classes and subclasses contained in
java.util. Double wildcards are supported everywhere within a pattern. **.DumbName
would match every import which ends in DumbName. Wildcards are forbidden to be used in
combination with other characters within a single part, like in com.foo**. Also parts
within a package must not be empty like in foo..bar.
If a pattern does not contain any wildcards, matching degrades to a simple String comparison.
This rule implementation assumes that every analyzed java source file is syntactically correct. If a source file is not, the analysis result is undefined.
Import recognition works by comparing the import statements within your source files against the specified patterns. If your class uses wildcard imports like in
import java.util.*;this plugin will not be able to match that import against a banned pattern pointing to a
concrete class like java.util.ArrayList. However, wildcard recognition would still work
as expected.
For checking the basePackage and exclusion patterns, the plugin tries to construct the
full qualified class name (FQCN) of each analyzed source file. It does so by
concatenating the file name to the source file's value of the package <value>;
statement. Thus if your exclusion pattern points to a concrete class like
com.name.ClassName the exclusion will only match if this class is declared in a file
with the exact name ClassName.java. The same applies in case you use a base package
pattern with no wild cards.
Overview of all configuration parameters:
| Parameter | Type | Required | Default | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
basePackage(s) |
(List of) package pattern | no | ** |
|
bannedImport(s) |
(List of) package pattern | yes | ||
allowedImport(s) |
(List of) package pattern | no | empty list | |
exclusion(s) |
(List of) package pattern | no | empty list | |
includeTestCode |
Boolean | no | false |
0.7.0 |
reason |
String | no | empty String | 0.8.0 |
failBuild |
Boolean | true |
0.17.0 |
|
skip |
Boolean | false |
0.17.0 |
- Deprecated: Setting this property might have no effect but will log a descriptive warning
- Soft-Removed: Setting this property will fail the build with a descriptive warning that this property is no longer supported
- Removed: The property no longer exists and the plugin behaves as if it never did.
This project adheres to version 2 of the semantic version specification.
You can always safely update the minor and the patch version of the rule's dependency entry within a pom.xml without breaking your build. Interface or behavioral changes will only ever be introduced with a new major version.
This artifact is (currently) not meant to be used as standalone dependency. Thus breaking code changes might occur even between two different patch versions!
- #39: Handle double semicolon after import statement
- #37: Fix version incompatibility
- Display analysis duration
- #35: Recognize multiple import statements on same line in groovy sources
- Remove
commentLineBufferSize
- Fix possible file resource leak while iterating source files
- Remove
sourceFileCharset - Soft-Remove
commentLineBufferSize - #34: Recognize multiple import statements on same line in java sources
- #33: Possibility to forbid wildcard imports
- #31: Results show whether a match occurred in a test file
- #30: Separate import parsing and banned import analysis
- #29: SPI for
SourceLineParserimplementations - #27: Introduce
failBuildandskipoptions - Fix mysterious case where
"*would be recognized as the beginning of a block comment - Introduce changelog to readme
- Add contribution guide lines