-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24
Rotavirus
1)Immunology
In a seminal paper, Velazquez et al. [80] followed up 200 healthy children over their first 2 years of life for the occurrence of RV disease and for associated immune responses. Primary RV infection typically resulted in AGE, but protection developed against subsequent RV infections, with a progressively lower risk of disease. No moderate or severe disease was observed after 2 RV infections.
Immunity after neonatal RV infection did not confer protection from reinfection [86–88], but in some cases, it protected against severe clinical disease
The majority of RV-specific B cells circulating in the blood in children express the gut-specific homing receptor α4β7 [106, 107], suggesting local protective action.
RV infection is a relatively poor inducer of cytokine-secreting, virus-specific CD8+ cells [114], although these cells are present in the peripheral blood in most adults [115]. Circulating RV-specific T-helper (Th) cells are detected in blood samples from infants during the convalescent phase [26, 27]. Dendritic cells infected with RV in vitro can stimulate RV-specific T cells to secrete Th1 cytokines [116, 117] and have been shown to produce IFN-γ after infection with rhesus RV [117] but are less efficient in presenting antigens in infants and young children than in adults [114]. The role of cell-mediated immune responses for protection in humans remains to be explored.
Rotavirus dsRNA stable in environment
- Genetic diversity:
- Different species
- Epidemiological studies (largely hospital based) have shown that 5 rotavirus genotypes (G1P[8], G3P[8], G4P[8], G2P[4], and G9P[8]) have been the most common types causing severe disease in children in most countries during the last 20 years
- Genotypes vary across years cycling 3-7 years (rotavirus a)
- Phylogenies do not show as strong of genetic drift as influenza, partly because lower mutation rate and dsRNA
- Because of lower homotypic immunity than influenza, promotes coexistence of strains rather than sequential replacement of strains within subtypes
- Emergence of new clades after vaccination programs started
These mechanisms include (1) accumulation of point mutations (genetic drift) that can lead to antigenic changes; (2) reassortment that lead to viruses with novel genetic and antigenic characteristics, which can occur as a result of exchange between 2 human strains or human and animal strains; (3) direct transmission of animal strains into a human host; and (4) gene rearrangement (eg, deletions, duplications, and insertions) into coding or noncoding regions, primarily of nonstructural genes
10 VP7 and 7 VP4
nABs against outer glycoprotein g and p assignment serotypes G1 accounts for 75% of isolates G1P8
2008 WGS genotyping Multiple Genes used to classify
Immune response B and T VP4 and VP7 neutralize
- Population dynamics:
-
G1P[8] is the dominant strain in most parts of the world, but occasionally other strains dominate
-
Cycles are typically 3-11 years
-
Modeled the strength of homo- and heterotypic immunity and its impact on coexistence and cyclic dynamics -- Model based on reduced susceptibility and infectiousness (Rel. risk for homotypic reinfection: 0.01-0.5, Rel. risk for heterotypic reinfection: 0.5-1.0). -- After infection with 2 types, assumed that host was immune to all
-
Found that shorter cycles occur if relative risk to homotypic strain is weaker (A)
-
Introduced vaccination which either provided stronger immunity to G1P[8] or equal immunity against all
-
Preferential immunity against G1P[8] lead to the dominance of other strains (B, C)
-
Equal immunity against all lead to continued dominance of G1P[8] (D,E)
-
Emergence of novel strains
-
(A) Vaccine protects preferentially to G1P[8], with some protection to new strain
-
(B) Vaccine provides no protection against new strain
-
(C/D) - Equal protection against current strains but weak against new strain. In (C), new strain now cycles with G1P[8]
Outstanding questions:
- Heterotypic immunity - cross-neutralization panels and antigenic cartography
- Can a new strain invade in absence of vaccination?